Following a pretest, 8 participants who were unfamiliar with algebraic and trigonometric functions received a brief presentation on the rectangular coordinate system. Next, they participated in a computer-interactive matching-to-sample procedure that trained formula-to-formula and formula-to-graph relations. Then, they were exposed to 40 novel formula-to-graph tests and 10 novel graph-to-formula tests. Seven of the 8 participants showed substantial improvement in identifying formula-to-graph relations; however, in the test of novel graph-to-formula relations, participants tended to select equations in their factored form. Next, we manipulated contextual cues in the form of rules regarding mathematical preferences. First, we informed participants that standard forms of equations were preferred over factored forms. In a subsequent test of 10 additional novel graph-to-formula relations, participants shifted their selections to favor equations in their standard form. This preference reversed during 10 more tests when financial reward was made contingent on correct identification of formulas in factored form. Formula preferences and transformation of novel mathematical and stimulus functions are discussed.

Following a pretest, 11 participants who were naive with regard to various algebraic and trigonometric transformations received an introductory lecture regarding the fundamentals of the rectangular coordinate system. Following the lecture, they took part in a computerinteractive matching-to-sample procedure in which they received training on particular formulato-formula and formula-to-graph relations as these formulas pertain to reflections and vertical and horizontal shifts. In training A-B, standard formulas served as samples and factored formulas served as comparisons. In training B-C, factored formulas served as samples and graphs served as comparisons. Subsequently, the program assessed for mutually entailed B-A and C-B relations as well as combinatorially entailed C-A and A-C relations. After all participants demonstrated mutual entailment and combinatorial entailment, we employed a test of novel relations to assess 40 different and complex variations of the original training formulas and their respective graphs. Six of 10 participants who completed training demonstrated perfect or near-perfect performance in identifying novel formula-to-graph relations. Three of the 4 participants who made more than three incorrect responses during the assessment of novel relations showed some commonality among their error patterns. Derived transfer of stimulus control using mathematical relations is discussed.DESCRIPTORS: mutual entailment, combinatorial entailment, mathematical relations, stimulus equivalence, novel relations, matching to sample, relational frame theory

Participants were pretrained and tested on mutually entailed trigonometric relations and combinatorially entailed relations as they pertained to positive and negative forms of sine, cosine, secant, and cosecant. Experiment 1 focused on training and testing transformations of these mathematical functions in terms of amplitude and frequency followed by tests of novel relations. Experiment 2 addressed training in accordance with frames of coordination (same as) and frames of opposition (reciprocal of ) followed by more tests of novel relations. All assessments of derived and novel formula-to-graph relations, including reciprocal functions with diversified amplitude and frequency transformations, indicated that all 4 participants demonstrated substantial improvement in their ability to identify increasingly complex trigonometric formula-to-graph relations pertaining to same as and reciprocal of to establish mathematically complex repertoires.

Fifteen participants unfamiliar with mathematical operations relative to reflections and vertical and horizontal shifts were exposed to an introductory lecture regarding the fundamentals of the rectangular coordinate system and the relationship between formulas and their graphed analogues. The lecture was followed immediately by computer-assisted instructions and matching-tosample procedures in which participants were e)(posed to computerposted rules regarding the relationship between particular types of formulas and their respective graphs. After participants demonstrated mutual entailment on formula-to-graph and graph-toformula functions, they were assessed for 36 novel relations on complex variations of the original training formulas and graphs. In Experiment 1, 5 of 15 participants demonstrated perfect or near perfect performance on all novel relationships. Experiment 2 was directed at the remaining 10 participants who failed to correctly identify all mathematical relationships assessed in Experiment 1 . The error patterns for these 10 participants were classified with the help of an artificial neural network self-organizing map (SOM). Training in Experiment 2 was directed exclusively at the types of errors identified by the SOM . Following remedial training , all participants demonstrated a substantial reduction in errors compared to their performance in Experiment 1. Derived transfer of stimulus control using mathematical relations is discussed.Many everyday occurrences entail two or more elements that are associated by some rule of correspondence. The mathematical term for such a correspondence is a relation. Within the stimulus equivalence Portions of this paper were presented at the 29th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, May 2003. We thank Dermot Barnes-Holmes and two excellent reviewers for their detailed and constructive comments on this manuscript.

No abstract