Geophysical swath mapping, multichannel seismic profiling, and ocean drilling data are used to document the structural evolution of Sumisu Rift and to analyze the pattern of strain resulting from extension of an intraoceanic island arc. The ∼120‐km‐long, 30–50‐km‐wide Sumisu Rift is bounded to the north and south by structural and volcanic highs west of the Sumisu and Torishima calderas and longitudinally by curvilinear border fault zones with both convex and concave dip slopes. The zig‐zag pattern of normal faults (average strikes 337° and 355°) indicates extension oriented 076°±10°, orthogonal to the volcanic arc. Three oblique transfer zones divide the rift along strike into four segments with different fault trends and uplift/subsidence patterns. Differential strain across the transfer zones is accommodated by interdigitating, rift‐parallel faults and sometimes by cross‐rift volcanism, rather than by strike‐ or oblique‐slip faults. From estimates of extension (2–5 km), the age of the rift (∼2 Ma), and the accelerating subsidence, we infer that Sumisu Rift is in the early synrift stage of back arc basin formation. Following an early sag phase, half graben formed with synthetically faulted, structural rollovers facing large‐offset (2–2.5 km throw) border fault zones. In the three northern rift segments the largest faults are on the arc side and dip 60°–75°W, whereas in the southern segment they are on the west side and dip 25°–50°E. The present “full graben” stage is dominated by hanging wall antithetic faulting, basin widening by footwall collapse, and a concentration of subsidence in an inner rift. The hanging wall collapses, but not necessarily as a result of border fault propagation from adjacent rift segments. Whereas the border faults may penetrate the Theologically weak lithosphere (Te ≈ 3 km), many of the hanging wall and footwall collapse structures are detached only a few kilometers below the seafloor. Back arc volcanism, usually erupted along faults, occurs in the rift and along the protoremnant arc during both stages. Where drilled, the arc margin has been uplifted 1.1±0.5 km concurrently with ∼1.1 km of rift basin subsidence. Extremely high sedimentation rates, up to 6 m/kyr in the inner rift, have kept pace with synrift faulting, created a smooth basin floor, and resulted in sediment thicknesses that mimic the differential basin subsidence. A linear zone of weakness caused by the greater temperatures and crustal thickness along the arc volcanic line controls the initial locus of rifting. Rifts are better developed between the arc edifices; intrusions may be accommodating extensional strain adjacent to the arc volcanoes. No obvious correlations are observed between the rift structures and preexisting cross‐arc trends.

Shatsky Rise consists of three highs arranged in a linear trend more than 1300 km long. Shatsky Plateau, the southernmost and largest of three highs is represented by an exposed basement high of presumed Late Jurassic age flanked by a sedimentary sequence of at least Cretaceous and Cenozoic age that reaches a maximum thickness of more than 1100 m. Drilling on Shatsky Rise is restricted to eight DSDP and ODP sites on the southern plateau that partially penetrated the sedimentary sequence. Leg 132 seismic profiles and previous seismic records from Shatsky Plateau reveal a five-part seismic section that is correlated with the drilling record and used to interpret the sedimentary history of the rise. The seismic sequence documents the transit of Shatsky Plateau beneath the equatorial divergence in the Late Cretaceous by horizontal plate motion from an original location in the Southern Hemisphere. Unconformities and lithologic changes bounding several of the seismic units are correlated with paleoceanographic changes that resulted in erosional events near the Barremian/Aptian, Cenomanian/Turonian, and Paleogene/Neogene boundaries.

No abstract

Abstract. Zebra mussels (Dreissena) have expanded rapidly throughout most of the Laurentian Great I~akes since their inadvertent release in 1986. These exotic molluscs now occur in great numbers on the bottom of western Lake Erie where they are found increasingly in deeper areas of the basin (average depth: 10 m), on sott, muddy substrates. '[-his study is aimed at quantifying the density and the distribution patterns of mussel colonization in the basin as a first step in investigating the effect on sediment properties of such an abrupt change in benthic community structure. Underwater video imager T and diver-collected samples taken from representative o~shore areas (seven sites) in western Lake Erie showed colonization levels of up to 20,000 live mussels per m in soft sediments (adult.,; with shells '10 mm comprised 47 %). Digital side-scan sonar records confirmed that colonization patterns were not random, but showed distinctive spatial signatures ranging from 30-m-long parallel stripes, to large ovate masses. Broad irregular mats were found in association with bard bottoms (bedrock, boulders, or wrecks and large debris). Mussel densities were averaged from the sites, assuming consistent relationships with substrate type ,and were combined with digitized percentage &areal coverage of major bottom types in western Lake Erie. This resulted in the first population figure of 10 ~3 in the basin. "['his figure includes molluscs of all sizes 9 0.84 mm.

The zebra mussel (Dreissena), inadvertently introduced to the Great Lakes in 1986, has since expanded to cover most of the shallow-water, hard substrates in Lakes Erie and Ontario. Colony densities exceed 300,000 per m2 in some bedrock areas of western Lake Erie. The objective of this study was to investigate the spread of zebra mussel onto soft sediment areas of the western basin of Lake Erie and to identify natural controls on the large-scale colonization of such sediments. Combined side scan sonar, underwater video imagery, and direct diver observation showed three modes of viable zebra mussel colonies in soft substrates: 1) attachment to zebra mussel shell debris deposited in linear troughs (stripes); 2) attachment to shells built up over hard substrates intermittently covered by soft sediments (footballs); and 3) as isolated clumps (druses) attached to dropstones, unionid clams, or their shells. Their spatial distribution suggests that zebra mussel expansion onto soft sediments is supplied primarily by nearby hard substrate areas. Zebra mussel populations living on soft sediment have the normal size distribution as those found on hard surfaces, often with a bimodal or trimodal character, representing cohorts of different ages. At the sites studied, there was a large proportion of dead shells, suggesting colonization over an extended period, as well as a relatively high mortality rate due to burial by periodic catastrophic sedimentation after storms. This vulnerability and the need to be near to source areas make it unlikely that the zebra mussel (D. polymorpha) will continue to expand into areas of soft sediment remote from hard substrate areas. The impact of the zebra mussel colonies on important textural properties of the substrate was not dramatic, but median grain diameter was significantly finer, organic carbon significantly higher, and sediment consistency more clayey below zebra mussel mats. Metal content was generally higher in the samples below zebra mussel mats, but the differences were statistically significant only in the case of iron and maganese. However, the sediment concentrations of metals at all sites were much greater than those at the remote Mid-basin site that was barren of zebra mussels, suggesting an overall metal enrichment near zebra mussel colonies.