Summary. A 40‐item chemistry‐based ‘cognitive preference test’ was developed and administered to 284 students subsequent to their study of O‐level chemistry, in an attempt to identify preferred modes of attending to scientific subject matter. The results allow two major cognitive styles scales to be formulated: the first measures students' ‘scientific curiosity,’ i.e., their willingness to extend their knowledge of chemistry beyond existing confines; the second scale measures students' orientation towards the ‘pure’ or ‘applied’ science side. Cognitive styles were found to vary considerably with academic ability in chemistry: high achievers are strongly inclined towards further learning of the subject and oriented towards the ‘pure’ science domain. Low achievers display the reverse characteristics.
Using a mixed‐methods approach, this article evaluates the equity implications of Zimbabwe's presumptive tax system, introduced in 2005 to raise revenue from the country's growing informal sector. The representative taxpayer method, which compares the hypothetical tax burdens of formal and informal sector taxpayers at varying income levels, shows that the presumptive tax regime undermines both vertical and horizontal equity. In addition, interviews with key informants from the tax authorities, other relevant organizations and informal sector operators were conducted to probe issues around collection, compliance and perceptions of fairness. The qualitative data suggest that weak enforcement, with more visible informal activities bearing the brunt of the tax burden, and selective (and sometimes politically motivated) application of the legislation, compromise equity further.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.