Balloon-expandable intraluminal stents were used to treat iliac artery stenoses or occlusions that failed to respond to conventional balloon angioplasty. One hundred seventy-one procedures were performed in 154 patients, of whom 48 had a limb at risk for amputation. Thirty-six had severe and 70 had moderate intermittent claudication. At the latest follow-up examination (average, 6 months; range, 1-24 months), 137 patients demonstrated clinical benefit, 113 of whom had become asymptomatic. Eleven patients showed no initial benefit, and six improved initially but later developed new vascular symptoms. Complications occurred in 18 patients. In three patients, complications were directly related to the device. Two occlusions were successfully recanalized, and an intramural collection of contrast material secondary to balloon perforation evolved favorably. The remaining patients had groin hematoma (n = 6), distal embolization (n = 4), extravasation (n = 2), transient renal failure (n = 1), pseudoaneurysm at the puncture site (n = 1), or subintimal dissection (n = 1). All stents have remained patent to the latest follow-up examination without evidence of migration or aneurysm formation.

While both the balloon catheter and the bougie are effective for esophageal dilation, each has its proponents. From a biomechanical point of view, the two methods should differ significantly, since bougienage depends on advancing a tapered dilator to generate radial force and balloon catheter dilation depends solely on balloon inflation to generate its radial dilating force. In a series of equivalent esophageal stenoses made by suture plication in swine esophageal segments, the authors measured shear force and radial force generated by dilation with a Maloney bougie, a Savary-Gilliard bougie, and an esophageal balloon. The mean radial forces generated were 6.42, 4.46, and 4.04 N, respectively, which did not differ significantly. However, the mean shear forces measured were 16.92, 6.92, and 1.44 N, respectively. The shear force with the Maloney bougie differed significantly from that with the Savary-Gilliard and the balloon and was on the same order of magnitude as the tensile strength of the esophagus (25-27 N). The shear force with the balloon was significantly lower than that with either bougie. In theory, the reduced shear force associated with balloon dilation might reduce the risk of esophageal perforation, but safety will have to be determined in clinical trials.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract