This pilot study demonstrates that supplementation with a combination of chromium picolinate and biotin in poorly controlled patients with diabetes receiving antidiabetic therapy improved glucose management and several lipid measurements. Chromium picolinate/ biotin supplementation may represent an effective adjunctive nutritional therapy to people with poorly controlled diabetes with the potential for improving lipid metabolism.
Abstract-Guideline committees recommend targets of treatment based on trial data on efficacy and effectiveness.Quality-assurance initiatives apply these parameters in the general practice setting. Therefore, targets must be feasible and achievable by the practicing physicians who are judged by these targets as goals for care. We evaluated 437 patients in the Rush University Hypertension Clinic using the Health Employer Data Information Set (HEDIS) measures for 2000 to assess goal achievement in a practice-based setting. We compared guideline achievement of uncomplicated hypertensive and diabetic subjects to standards dictated by HEDIS, the 6th Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI), and the American Diabetic Association (ADA)/National Kidney Foundation (NKF). Overall, 276 (63%) patients achieved SBP goal, with 376 (86%) achieving DBP goal and 358 (59%) achieving both goals. However, in the 20% of patients who were diabetic, only 52% had a BP of Ͻ140 mm Hg and Ͻ90 mm Hg, whereas only 22% achieved the more stringent goals of JNC VI of Ͻ130 mm Hg systolic and Ͻ85 mm Hg diastolic and only 15% achieved the ADA/NKF goals of Ͻ130 mm Hg systolic and Ͻ80 mm Hg diastolic. Although goal was achievable in most uncomplicated hypertension, hypertension in diabetes was more difficult to control, despite being more likely to receive enhanced benefit from effective management. Goal-oriented strategy, especially in diabetic subjects, should be aggressively sought rather than relaxing goals to promote achievement.
The epidemic of obesity in the United States and around the world is intensifying in severity and scope and has been implicated as an underlying mechanism in systemic hypertension. Obese hypertensive individuals characteristically exhibit volume congestion, relative elevation in heart rate, and high cardiac output with concomitant activation of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system. When the metabolic syndrome is present, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia may contribute to hypertension through diverse mechanisms. Blood pressure can be lowered when weight control measures are successful, using, for example, caloric restriction, aerobic exercise, weight loss drugs, or bariatric surgery. A major clinical challenge resides in converting short‐term weight reduction into a sustained benefit. Pharmacotherapy for the obese hypertensive patient may require multiple agents, with an optimal regimen consisting of inhibitors of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system, thiazide diuretics, β‐blockers, and calcium channel blockers if needed to attain contemporary blood pressure treatment goals.
Distal embolic protection (DEP) may prevent embolization of atherosclerotic debris during renal artery stenting. The authors retrospectively identified 48 hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who underwent renal artery stenting between 2002 and 2005 and compared stenting alone (n=17) to stenting/DEP (n=31). Blood pressure (BP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73m2) at baseline at 6 and 12 months were compared. Overall, eGFR improved by 4.7 (P=.005) at 6 months and 3.8 (P=.003) at 12 months compared with baseline. Comparing stent to stent/DEP patients, eGFR improvement did not differ at 6 months (7.6 vs 2.9; P=.15) or at 12 months (4.4 vs 3.5; P=.74). Systolic BP reduction was similar between stent and stent/DEP patients at 6 months (−9 vs −14 mm Hg; P=.59) and at 12 months (−18 vs −16 mm Hg; P=.89). Renal artery stenting improved eGFR and systolic BP in patients with hypertension and CKD; however, DEP did not enhance these effects.
Abstract-Several clinical trials using a blood pressure (BP) treatment algorithm focused on a predetermined goal have achieved better control rates than those of national survey data. These trials reached the Sixth Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) goal of Ͻ90 mm Hg in Ͼ90% of volunteers and systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal of Ͻ140 mm Hg in Ͼ60% of volunteers. We evaluated BP control of 437 consecutive patients after at least one year of follow up in a specialist clinic which employed "goal-oriented management," ie, treating to a specific BP goal without a formal drug treatment algorithm, to determine whether JNC VI goals could be achieved. Overall, 276 (63%) patients achieved SBP goal, with 376 (86%) at DBP goal and 358 (59%) at both goals. Only 23% of patients were on monotherapy, with 34% requiring 2 drugs and 37% requiring 3 or more medications. There was no substantial difference in BP control rates among age, gender, and ethnicity subgroups. However, in the 20% of patients who were diabetic, only 52% had a BP of Ͻ140 mm Hg and Ͻ90 mm Hg, whereas fewer (22% and 15%, respectively) achieved the more stringent goals of JNC VI and the American Diabetic Association (ADA)/National Kidney Foundation (NKF
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.