OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the role of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastics and textile materials in the home in the development of bronchial obstruction during the first 2 years of life. METHODS: The study was a matched pair case-control study based on a cohort of 3754 newborns in Oslo in 1992 and 1993 who were followed up for 2 years. The case group consisted of 251 children with bronchial obstruction; the control group was matched one-to-one for date of birth. RESULTS: In conditional logistic regression analysis, the risk of bronchial obstruction was related to the presence of PVC flooring (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14, 3.14) and textile wall materials (adjusted OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 0.98, 2.54). The reference category was wood or parquet flooring and painted walls and ceiling. Further analysis revealed an exposure-response relationship between the assessed amount of PVC and other plasticizer-containing surface materials and the risk of bronchial obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence of the role of PVC and textile wall materials in the development of bronchial obstruction in young children.
A substantial number of parents perceive that their children have adverse reactions to food, but it is well documented that objective assessments agree with only one-quarter to one-half of parentally reported reactions. In order to prevent wrong diagnoses and curtail unnecessary or inadequate diets, primary health care providers need to deal with the parental perception of adverse reactions to food. A description of the prevalence and pattern of parentally perceived adverse reactions to food in children is needed to meet this challenge. The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence, incidence and cumulative incidences of parentally perceived adverse reactions to food in children younger than 2 years of age, and to study the duration of the reactions. A population-based cohort of 3623 children born in Norway was followed from birth until the age of two. At 6-month intervals, the parents completed questionnaires regarding the occurrence and type of any reaction to food. Information was available on the outcome measure at all age points for 77.4% of the families and these were used in the analyses; 3.8% of the cohort were entirely lost to follow-up. The cumulative incidence of adverse reactions to food was 35% by age two. Fruits, milk and vegetables accounted for nearly two-thirds of all reported reactions. Milk was the single food item most commonly incriminated, the cumulative incidence being 11.6%. The cumulative incidences of reported reactions to fruits and vegetables were 20.4% and 7.3%, respectively, with citrus fruits, strawberry and tomatoes as the most common food items in these groups. The cumulative incidences were less for food reactions associated with eggs (4.4%), fish (3%), nuts (2.1%) and cereals (1.4%). The duration of the reactions was short - approximately two-thirds of the reactions were not reported again 6 months later. However, the probability of remission depended on the food item concerned, the age at onset of reactions, and whether the reaction had been reported previously or not. Adverse reactions to food are reported by the parents of one-third of children in Norway before the age of two. The most striking feature of this study is the short duration of the food reactions, as approximately two-thirds of the reactions are not reported again 6 months later. Nevertheless, the high frequency of reactions attributable to milk is of concern. Milk is an important part of the Norwegian diet for children, and if removed from the diet its nutritional value is not easily replaced. Further studies are needed to assess the degree to which parents alter the diet of their children based upon perceived reactions to food.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.