No abstract

This paper focuses on the agronomic evaluation of a synthetic NPK (N in the form of urea, P and K in the form of phosphate monopotassium) fertilizers blended with four types of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood biochar prepared at different thermal regimes (300 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C and 700 °C). The evaluation of benefits was done based on crop nutritional status and soil fertility. The pot experiment was set up with fertile Haplic Luvisol fertilized with 1.85 g kg−1 of blends of biochar (1.25 g) with urea (310 mg) and KH2PO4 (290 mg), which is equivalent to 500 kg ha−1 (biochar ~67.6%; N ~7.8%; P ~3.6%; K ~4.7%) applied before sowing. Only NPK blends made with biochar containing 75% or 85% carbon increased the biomass of 27-day old wheat seedlings from 12% to 20% in comparison to NPK applied alone. These blends raised the content of Mn and Fe in plants but decreased the contents of Ca and Mg. All the tested mixtures enhanced soil fertility by increasing the content of humic acids. Additionally, the content of potentially phytotoxic phenolic compounds was lower. In general, the addition of biochar to NPK fertilizer did not show a negative effect on crop quality. The overall results of the study suggest that the application of low doses of biochar to synthetic fertilizer can benefit crops and can support soil fertility.

This study aimed to examine the influence of long-lasting moderate (45% field water capacity—FWC) and severe (30% FWC) water stress and application of sulphur (elemental sulphur or sulphate) on the growth, yield and mineral composition of wheat and maize. Concentrations of macro- and micronutrients were determined in the aboveground parts of the plants. Drought stress caused a marked decrease in the growth parameters of both plants. Under both optimal water conditions (60% FWC) and moderate water stress (45% FWC), grain yields of wheat grown without sulphur application were not significantly different. Applying elemental sulphur caused an increase in grain yield under moderate stress, whereas sulphate was more effective in wheat grown under adequate water supply. Severe water stress significantly lowered wheat yield, regardless of sulphur fertilisation. Increasing water stress resulted in a greater reduction in maize growth, with an average 50% decrease in dry mass under severe water stress. Both crops maintained relatively high levels of macro- (N, P, K, Mg, Ca, S) and microelements (Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn) and did not suffer noticeably from deficiencies in such. Sulphur application did not modify these relationships. In conclusion, sulphur fertilisation may be recommended in wheat cultivation when plants are exposed to moderate water stress.

This study aimed to examine the influence of increasing doses of chromium (Cr) (26, 39, and 52 mg kg−1 soil) and elemental sulfur (S) (60 mg kg−1 soil) on growth, yield, and mineral nutrition in wheat and maize. Macro- and micronutrients and Cr concentrations were determined in the aboveground parts of plants. All examined doses of Cr caused a marked decrease in the fresh and dry weight of maize. Wheat was more tolerant than maize, and lower Cr doses caused a small but statistically significant increase in the total yield. Wheat accumulated more than twofold Cr than maize, and the concentrations increased with higher Cr concentrations in the soil. The application of S significantly improved the total biomass production and lowered the Cr content in both plants. Cr changed the mineral nutrition in both cereals, but the pattern of changes observed was not the same. Applying S alleviated some adverse effects caused by the Cr. Hence, it is concluded that the application of elemental S may be an effective strategy to reduce adverse effects in plants grown on soil contaminated by heavy metals, especially Cr.

No abstract