In this study, the potential application of slag-fly ash-based geopolymers as stabilizers for soft soil in sulfate erosion areas was investigated to promote environmental protection and waste residue recycling. The changes in the physical and mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of cement-stabilized soil/geopolymer-stabilized soil under sulfate erosion were comparatively studied through tests such as appearance change, mass change, strength development, and microscopic examination. The results show that the sulfate resistance of stabilized soil is significantly affected by the stabilizer type. In the sulfate environment, the cement-stabilized soil significantly deteriorates with erosion age due to the expansion stress induced by AFt, while the geopolymer-stabilized soil exhibits excellent sulfate resistance. The slag-fly ash ratio (10:0, 9:1, 8:2 and 7:3) is an important factor affecting the sulfate resistance of geopolymer-stabilized soils, and the preferred value occurs at 9:1 (G-2). When immersed for 90 d, the unconfined compressive strength value of G-2 is 7.13 MPa, and its strength retention coefficient is 86.6%. The N-A-S-H gel formed by the polymerization in the geopolymer contributes to hindering the intrusion of sulfate ions, thereby improving the sulfate resistance of stabilized soil. The research results can provide a reference for technology that stabilizes soil with industrial waste in sulfate erosion areas.

The complexity of composite geopolymer materials results in instability in the setting and hardening of geopolymer-stabilized soil. In order to determine the appropriate mix proportion scheme for composite geopolymer-stabilized soil, this study investigated the effects of two preparation methods, fly ash/slag ratio and alkali activator modulus, on workability and strength development trends in alkali-excited fly ash and slag-based geopolymer-stabilized soil. The results showed that the high ambient temperatures created by the one-step method were more conducive to the setting and hardening of the geopolymer-stabilized soil; its 3 d/28 d UCS (unconfined compression strength) ratio was 62.43–78.60%, and its 7 d/28 d UCS ratio was 70.37–83.63%. With increases of the alkali activator modulus or the proportion of fly ash, the setting time of stabilized soil was gradually prolonged, and its fluidity increased. Meanwhile, the strength development of stabilized soil was significantly affected by the proportion of fly ash and the alkali activator modulus; the maximum UCS value was obtained at II-2-O, prepared by the one-step method, with an alkali activator modulus of 1.2 and a fly ash/slag ratio of 20/80. Specifically, the 3, 7, and 28 d UCS values of II-2-O were 1.65, 1.89, and 2.26 MPa, respectively, and its 3 d/28 d UCS ratio and 7 d/28 d UCS ratio were 73.01% and 83.63%, respectively. These results will be of great importance in further research on (and construction guidance of) composite geopolymer-stabilized soil.

Sulfate attack is one of the non-negligible factors that induces deterioration in the performance and life cycle of soil stabilizers. In this paper, the degradation mechanism of the durability of slag–fly-ash-based geopolymer stabilized soft soil (hitherto referred to as SF-GSSS) under the sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) attack environment is comparatively investigated, and the slag/fly ash ratios are set to S10F0, S9F1, S8F2, and S7F3. The SF-GSSS was fully immersed in a 2.5% Na2SO4 solution and 2.5% MgSO4 solution, respectively, to characterize the deterioration rules via visual observations, an unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, and by mass change. The effect of sulfate on the microstructural characteristics of the SF-GSSS were determined by different microanalytical means, such as by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that the SF-GSSS immersed in a MgSO4 solution displayed significant physical deterioration, but not when in a Na2SO4 solution. The mass growth of the SF-GSSS when immersed in a Na2SO4 solution was significantly lower than when it was immersed in a MgSO4 solution at the same immersion age. The rate of strength loss was lowest for S9F1 and highest for S7F3 at the end of immersion, regardless of its immersion in Na2SO4 or MgSO4 solutions.