No abstract

Aims This study aims to establish the prevalence of aspirin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel, and warfarin use in patients undergoing cataract surgery, and to compare local anaesthetic and intraoperative complication rates between users and non-users. Methods The Cataract National Dataset was remotely extracted and anonymised on 55 567 operations at 12 NHS Trusts using electronic patient records (EPRs) between 2001 and 2006. Results This report analyses 48 862 of the 55 567 operations from the eight centres, which routinely recorded a drug history. In all, 28.1% of the 48 862 patients were taking aspirin, 5.1% warfarin, 1.9% clopidogrel, and 1.0% dipyridamole. The recording of any complication of a sharp needle or subtenon's cannula local anaesthetic block was increased in patients taking clopidogrel, 8.0% (Po0.0001) or warfarin, 6.2% (P ¼ 0.0026) vs non-users, 4.3%, but no increase in potentially sight-threatening complications was identified. The incidence of subconjunctival haemorrhage was increased in patients taking clopidogrel, 4.4% (Po0.0001) or warfarin, 3.7% (Po0.0001) vs non-users, 1.7%. The recording of any operative complication was increased in those taking clopidogrel, 7.3% (P ¼ 0.0002) vs non-users, 4.4%, but the haemorrhagic operative complications of choroidal/ suprachoroidal haemorrhage and hyphaema were not significantly increased. The non-haemorrhagic complication of posterior capsular rupture (PCR) was increased in those taking clopidogrel, 3.23% (P ¼ 0.0057) vs non-users, 1.77%.Conclusions Clopidogrel or warfarin use was associated with a significant increase in minor complications of sharp needle and subtenon's cannula local anaesthesia but was not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anaesthetic or operative haemorrhagic complications.

Appendectomy alone seems to be curative of these tumors with no influence on life expectancy. Follow-up is not only unnecessary, but its means, whether clinical, radiological or biological, are ineffective.

Introduction The preservation of fertility is an integral part of care of children requiring gonadotoxic treatments for cancer or non‐malignant diseases. In France, the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue has been considered and has been offered as a clinical treatment since its inception. The aim of this study is to review 20 years of activity in fertility preservation by ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for children and the feasibility of oocyte isolation and cryopreservation from the ovarian tissue at a single center. Material and methods Retrospective study including patients aged 15 years or younger who underwent OTC, combined for some with oocyte cryopreservation of isolated oocytes, before a highly gonadotoxic treatment for malignant or non‐malignant disease was initiated. We describe the evolution of activities in our program for fertility preservation and patient characteristics at the time of OTC and follow up. Results From April 1998 to December 2018, 418 girls and adolescents younger than 15 years of age underwent OTC, representing 40.5% of all females who have had ovarian tissue cryopreserved at our center. In all, 313 patients had malignant diseases and 105 had benign conditions. Between November 2009 and July 2013, oocytes were isolated and also cryopreserved in 50 cases. The mean age of patients was 6.9 years (range 0.3‐15). The most frequent diagnoses in this cohort included neuroblastoma, acute leukemia and hemoglobinopathies; neuroblastoma being the most common diagnosis in very young patients. During follow up, three patients requested the use of their cryopreserved ovarian tissue. All had undergone ovarian tissue transplantation, one for puberty induction and the two others for restoring fertility. So far, no pregnancies have been achieved. Eighty‐four patients who had OTC died. Conclusions Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is the only available technique for preserving fertility of girls. To our knowledge this is the largest series of girls and adolescents younger than 15 years so far reported on procedures of OTC before highly gonadotoxic treatment in a single center.

Primary stenting of TASC C and D lesions appears to be safe and efficient given the high-sustained clinical improvement and the low rate of ISR observed in our study. Endovascular treatment of such long and severe lesions exposes to high rate of stent fractures, which should not be a concern given their low clinical impact.