The local aerodynamic and heat transfer performance were measured in a rib-roughened square duct as a function of the rib pitch to height ratio. The blockage ratio of these square obstacles was 10 or 20 percent depending on whether they were placed on one single (1s) or on two opposite walls (2s). The Reynolds number, based on the channel mean velocity and hydraulic diameter, was fixed at 30,000. The aerodynamic description of the flow field was based on local pressure distributions along the ribbed and adjacent smooth walls as well as on two-dimensional LDV explorations in the channel symmetry plane and in two planes parallel to the ribbed wall(s). Local heat transfer distributions were obtained on the floor, between the ribs, and on the adjacent smooth side wall. Averaged parameters, such as friction factor and averaged heat transfer enhancement factor, were calculated from the local results and compared to correlations given in literature. This contribution showed that simple correlations derived from the law of the wall similarity and from the Reynolds analogy could not be applied for the present rib height-to-channel hydraulic diameter ratio (e/Dh = 0.1). The strong secondary flows resulted in a three-dimensional flow field with high gradients in the local heat transfer distributions on the smooth side walls.
The local aerodynamic and heat transfer performance were measured in a rib-roughened square duct as a function of the rib pitch to beight ratio. The blockage ratio of these square obstacles was 10% or 20% depending on whether they were placed on one single (1s) or on two opposite walls (2s). The Reynolds number, based on the channel mean velocity and hydraulic diameter, was fixed at 30000.
The aerodynamic description of the flow field was based on local pressure distributions along the ribbed and adjacent smooth walls as well as on 2D LDV explorations in the channel symmetry plane and in two planes parallel to the ribbed wall(s). Local heat transfer distributions were obtained on the floor, between the ribs, and on the adjacent smooth side wall. Averaged parameters, such as friction factor and averaged heat transfer enhancement factor, were calculated from the local results and compared to correlations given in literature.
This contribution showed that simple correlations derived from the law of the wall similarity and from the Reynolds analogy could not be applied for the present rib height-to-channel hydraulic diameter ratio (e/Dh=0.1). The strong secondary flows resulted in a three-dimensional flow field with high gradients in the local heat transfer distributions on the smooth side walls.
This paper deals with the application of a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for the prediction of steady viscous compressible flow and heat transfer in a square channel with one rib-roughened wall. The computation results are compared with detailed experiments carried out at the von Karman Institute. The two-dimensional computations agree rather well with the experiments for the prediction of the aerodynamics, even if the recirculation length is overestimated. In this case, a k-l turbulence model seems to be sufficient. However, heat transfer between the ribs is poorly matched except when a thermal ASM (algebraic stress model) turbulence model (GGDH, or generalized gradient diffusion hypothesis), which computes the u iθ (velocity-temperature) correlations by algebraic equations, is used. The three-dimensional computations capture the correct position of the reattachment point with the k-l turbulence model. It is nevertheless necessary to use the ASM turbulence model to find vortices turning the correct way in the cross-sections. These are indeed secondary flows of the second kind which are mainly due to turbulence anisotropy when the ribs are inclined at 90° to the flow direction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.