Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of dementia. The diagnosis of DLB is particularly important because these patients show good response to cholinesterase inhibitors. Clinical and neuroimaging criteria for DLB have not been acceptable for predictive accuracy. We report a case of progressive dementia in which the differentiation of DLB and Alzheimer disease (AD) on the basis of clinical criteria alone was not possible. The patient was admitted to the hospital because he became worse after he had started treatment for severe AD. Both MRI and brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy were normal. The patient underwent myocardial scintigraphy with I-123 MIBG showing marked reduction in cardiac MIBG accumulation. The heart to mediastinum ratio of MIBG uptake was impaired in both early and delayed images. FDG-PET scan before and after activation with a visual attention task showed occipital cortex hypometabolism as compared with AD and a normal control. This case illustrates the value of combining activated brain FDG PET and cardiac MIBG. The association of these 2 techniques could be used as a potential diagnostic tool in a patient with dementia misdiagnosed as AD.

Referees and assistant referees are submitted to high physical stress during matches. Pressure to make decisions in front of large crowds is another potential stressor. These two stressors can impair attention executive control, depending on physical fitness and individual vulnerability or resilience to situational pressure. Error percentage for referees and assistants may reach around 14% during a soccer match. Although previous studies have suggested that soccer referees and assistants should take cognitive assessments, they are only required by Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) to demonstrate knowledge of the rules and pass annually in a fitness test (FIFA-Test). This study aimed to assess attention performance in referees and assistants before and after the mandatory FIFA-Test. It is hypothesized that the high physical demands associated with the pressure to pass the FIFA-Test would interfere with attention performance. The sample included 33 referees and 20 assistants. The Continuous Visual Attention Test (CVAT) consisted of a 15-min Go/No-go task. Performance in the CVAT is based on four variables: omission and commission errors, reaction time, and variability of reaction time (VRT). Failure in the CVAT was defined by a performance below the 5th percentile of the age- and sex-matched normative data in at least one variable of the CVAT. Before the FIFA-Test all participants performed the CVAT. The second CVAT began 3–7 min directly following completion of the FIFA-test. Considering only the officials who passed both the FIFA-Test and the first CVAT (19 referees and 15 assistants), 44% (9 referees and 6 assistants) exhibited a performance decline in the second CVAT. A significant increase in VRT was found after the high intensity exercise. As increase in VRT is thought to reflect executive dysfunctions and lapses of attention, we concluded that physical fitness alone may not be enough to help officials cope with the physical and contextual stresses associated with the FIFA-Test. These data suggest that over 35% of soccer referees and their assistants who were considered physically able to referee matches may not be mentally prepared for the attentional demands of refereeing soccer matches.

This study shows that an improvement in an attentional test is a reliable predictor of the treatment response even without any improvement in the perception of pain.

Objective: Studies conducted in developed countries have shown that attentional impairment is commonly seen in patients with major depressive disorders (MDD). There is a lack of studies using culture-free neuropsychological instruments. Additionally, attention consists of different subdomains. Deficits in subdomains have not been investigated in MDD. Studies on subdomains using systematic frameworks are needed. We aimed to verify the percentage of Brazilian MDD patients with attention deficits, using a culture-free instrument; compare different attention subdomains in MDD patients with paired controls; find the subdomain that best discriminated controls from MDD patients. Method: Forty-five unmedicated patients currently with MDD and 45 age-and sex-matched controls participated in the study. Attention performance was measured by a Go/No-go task which detected omission errors, commission errors, reaction time (RT), and variability of reaction time (VRT). These variables assess four specific subdomains: focused attention (omission errors), response inhibition (commission errors), alertness (RT), and sustained attention (VRT). MANCOVAs were used to test group differences and logistic regressions to find the strongest predictor of MDD. Results: Compared with normative data, 73.3% of the patients and 17.7% of the controls exhibited attention deficits, defined as a z-score < 2.0 on two or more subdomains. Depressed patients showed poorer performance in all attention subdomains. The VRT variable was the strongest predictor of MDD. Lapses in attention as the test progresses affected the stability of RTs and increased VRT in MDD patients. Conclusions: A significant proportion of the depressive patients shows attention deficits, as described in developed countries; all attention subdomains are affected in MDD patients; sustained attention is the most affected subdomain. Key PointsQuestion: Do unmedicated depressed patients show objective attention impairments? Findings: Unmedicated patients exhibited a significant increase in intraindividual reaction-time variability in a continuous visual attention test, indicating a deficit in the sustained-attention subdomain. Importance: The continuous visual attention test is clinically useful to assess specific attentional subdomain impairments in depressed patients. Next Steps: Future research should be conducted in medicated depressed patients to evaluate the impact of treatment on objective attention performance.

Background: The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is commonly used to stage cognitive impairment, despite having educational limitations. In elderly with low education, a previous study has shown that intraindividual variability of reaction time (CV) and commission errors (CE), measured using a culture-free Go/No-Go task, can reliably distinguish early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy controls. Objective: We aimed to extend the clinical utility of this culture-free Go/No-Go task in a sample with high educational disparity. Methods: One hundred and ten participants with a wide range of years of formal education (0–14 years) were randomly selected from a geriatric unit and divided based on their CDR scores into cognitively unimpaired (CDR = 0), MCI (CDR = 0.5), and early AD (CDR = 1). All underwent a 90-s reaction-time test that measured the variables previously found to predict CDR in low educated elderly. Here we added years of formal education (educational level) to the model. Multivariate analyses compared differences in group means using educational level as confounding factor. A confirmatory discriminant analyses was performed, to assess if CDR scores could be predicted by the two Go/No-Go variables in a sample with high educational disparity. Results: Over all three groups, differences in both CE and CV reached statistical significance (p <  0.05). The discriminant analysis demonstrated that CV and CE discriminated cognitively impaired from cognitively normal elderly. These results remained similar when discriminating MCI from cognitively unimpaired elderly. Conclusion: The Go/No-Go task reliably discriminates elderly with MCI from elderly without cognitive impairment independent of educational disparity.