BackgroundSleep is essential for human health and functioning. Parents of preterm infants are susceptible to sleep disturbances because of stress related to the preterm birth. Poor sleep has the potential to affect parental health and well-being. The aim of this study was to identify and map evidence on sleep and its relationship to health in parents of preterm infants. No review has summarized the evidence on this topic.MethodsA scoping review was conducted. Seven health and medical electronic research databases were searched for relevant quantitative and qualitative primary studies, including grey literature. The search was performed March 2–7, 2017.ResultsTen American studies and one Australian study were included in the review. Most research was quantitative and focused on maternal sleep and mental health within the first two weeks after the childbirth. Both objective and subjective sleep measures were used to study sleep at the hospital; actigraphs were not used after discharge. Maternal sleep was poor early postpartum, and this was associated with negative health outcomes. Two cohort studies compared sleep in mothers of preterm and term infants, but the results were conflicting. In one qualitative study, fathers described their inability to catch up on sleep after homecoming with a preterm baby.ConclusionsQuantitative studies reporting on maternal sleep early postpartum was most frequently occurring in the results. Qualitative research on the topic was identified as a knowledge gap. More cultural and geographical breadth, including research on fathers’ sleep, is recommended in future research.
Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten, ved Nasjonal enhet for pasientsikkerhet tok i november 2007 initiativ til å danne en arbeidsgruppe for begrepsbruk innen pasientsikkerhet. Målet med arbeidsgruppens arbeid var å se naermer på begrepsbruk og ulike tilnaerminger til feltet. Arbeidsmetode: Arbeidsgruppen har hatt tre møter, samt holdt korrespondanse per e-post. På det første møtet i arbeidsgruppen diskuterte en ulike tilnaerminger til pasientsikkerhetsbegrepet og hva målsettingen med arbeidet skulle vaere. Arbeidsgruppen tok utgangspunkt i en diskusjon om pasientsikkerhet skal forstås som et begrep eller perspektiv innenfor kvalitetsforbedring, eller som et selvstendig perspektiv. Konklusjon: Systematisk arbeid med begrepsutvikling innen pasientsikkerhet i Norge bør reflektere diskusjonene som pågår både nasjonalt og internasjonalt. Det er behov for en klar og entydig begrepsbruk. Begrepsutvikling skal støtte opp om fagutviklingen innen pasientsikkerhetsarbeidet, og ikke stå i veien.
Background: ISBAR is a patient safety communication structure that aids simplified, effective, structured and anticipated communication between healthcare personnel. No research has previously been conducted on master's students' experiences of using ISBAR in Norway. In the past, there have been calls for education strategies that ensure students receive training in patient safety communication. Objective: To elucidate specialist nursing students' experiences of using ISBAR as a communication structure in clinical practice on a master's degree programme in specialist nursing. Method: The study has a qualitative descriptive design, and comprises three focus group interviews. A qualitative content analysis was carried out. Results: Using the tool made the students' communication more conscious, structured, clear and predictable. They conveyed objective, unambiguous and specific observations and changes instead of giving unfounded opinions. The students more readily proposed solutions of their own and clarified medical regulations. Using ISBAR made them feel more confident about their own communication and expertise, and improved their teamwork and patient safety. However, the ISBAR tool presented some challenges for the students since the communication structure had not been implemented at the hospital. Conclusion: Using ISBAR increases the awareness of users' own structured communication and expertise and allows them to obtain a quicker overview of patient situations. The findings highlight the importance of systematic training and simulation with the ISBAR structure in order to improve patient safety, both in the training of specialist nurses and in the specialist health service. Teamwork and communication between healthcare personnel are vital to quality of care and patient safety (1, 2). Patient safety is defined as protection against unnecessary harm resulting from the health service's efforts or lack of efforts (3). Communication failures in treatment teams are one of the most common causes of adverse events in the specialist health service, and about 70 per cent are due to human errors in non-technical skills such as communication, management and decision-making (1, 4, 5). A lack of structure and standardisation is sometimes to blame for communication failures (6). The communication structure Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (ISBAR) was created to standardise the effective transfer of information in the US armed forces. ISBAR was adopted by the public health service in the 2000s (1, 7) (Table 1). What is ISBAR? ISBAR is one of several frameworks for communication between healthcare personnel in relation to patient situations. Use of the instrument is considered to improve patient safety through more structured, focussed and concise communication among healthcare personnel (1, 8, 9). The US healthcare system implemented ISBAR around 2003, and its overarching goal in patient safety work is to improve communication (1). Norway introduced a national programme for patient safety in 2...
Background The early birth and hospitalization of a preterm infant in neonatal intensive care unit can produce several emotional and behavioural responses including sleep problems for parents. Few studies have explored sleep and its associations with health and HRQoL over time in this vulnerable parent population. This purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a prospective, comparative, longitudinal study of the sleep patterns and psychosocial health of preterm and full-born infants’ parents during the first postpartum year. Methods A prospective, comparative, longitudinal feasibility study was conducted. Parents of preterm infants were compared to parents of full-born infants to identify if there were differences in outcomes between the groups. The parents were instructed to wear actigraphs and complete sleep diaries for two consecutive weeks, and responded to a digital questionnaire covering stress, insomnia, fatigue, depression, social support, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life. Survey data were collected at infant ages of 2, 6, and 12 months, actigraphy and sleep diary data were collected at infant age of 2 months only. Descriptive analysis was used to describe recruitment and attrition rates. Differences between completers and dropouts were analysed with a chi-square test (categorical data) and Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test for two independent samples (continuous variables). Results Between June 2019 and March 2020, 25 parents of a preterm infant and 78 parents of a full-born infant were recruited from four neonatal intensive care units and two maternity wards, respectively, in four Norwegian hospitals. Feasibility was predefined as recruiting ≥ 75 parents each of preterm and full-born infants. The target for the full-born group was reached. However, the preterm group recruitment was challenging. Actigraphs, sleep diaries, and questionnaires were evaluated as feasible for use in a future study. Attrition rates were high in both groups at 6 and 12 months. No parent-related characteristics were associated with participation at 6 months. At 12 months, dropouts had a statistically significantly lower age in the full-born group (both parents) and higher age and body mass index in the preterm group (fathers). Conclusions A longitudinal study is feasible; however, procedural changes, including using active methods and contacting participants, are necessary to increase the recruitment of preterm infants’ parents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.