No abstract

A notation for an ordinal using patterns of resemblance is based on choosing an isominimal set of ordinals containing the given ordinal. There are many choices for this set meaning that notations are far from unique. We establish that among all such isominimal sets there is one which is smallest under inclusion thus providing an appropriate notion of normal form notation in this context. In addition, we calculate the elements of this isominimal set using standard notations based on collapsing functions. This provides a capstone to the results in [2, 6, 8, 9, 7], using further refinement of ordinal arithmetic developed in [8] which then both allows for a simple characterization of normal forms for patterns of order one and will play a key role in the arithmetical analysis of pure patterns of order two, [5].

In [2] T. J. Carlson introduces an approach to ordinal notation systems which is based on the notion of Σ1-elementary substructure. We gave a detailed ordinal arithmetical analysis (see [7]) of the ordinal structure based on Σ1-elementarily as defined in [2]. This involved the development of an appropriate ordinal arithmetic that is based on a system of classical ordinal notations derived from Skolem hull operators, see [6]. In the present paper we establish an effective order isomorphism between the classical and the new system of ordinal notations using the results from [6] and [7]. Moreover, on the basis of a concept of relativization we develop mutual (relatively) elementary recursive assignments which are uniform with respect to the underlying relativization.

We provide mutual elementary recursive order isomorphisms between classical ordinal notations, based on Skolem hulling, and notations from pure elementary patterns of resemblance of order $2$, showing that the latter characterize the proof-theoretic ordinal of the fragment $\Pi^1_1$-$\mathrm{CA}_0$ of second order number theory, or equivalently the set theory $\mathrm{KPl}_0$. As a corollary, we prove that Carlson's result on the well-quasi orderedness of respecting forests of order $2$ implies transfinite induction up to the ordinal of $\mathrm{KPl}_0$. We expect that our approach will facilitate analysis of more powerful systems of patterns.Comment: corrected Theorem 4.2 with according changes in section 3 (mainly Definition 3.3), results unchanged. The manuscript was edited, aligned with reference [14] (moving former Lemma 3.5 there), and argumentation was revised, with minor corrections in (the proof of) Theorem 4.2; results unchanged. Updated revised preprint; to appear in the APAL (2017

This article provides a detailed comparison between two systems of collapsing functions. These functions play a crucial role in proof theory, in the analysis of patterns of resemblance, and the analysis of maximal order types of well partial orders. The exact correspondence given here serves as a starting point for far reaching extensions of current results on patterns and well partial orders.