The role of the membrane electrochemical potential in the translocation of acidic and basic residues across the membrane was investigated with the M13 procoat protein, which has a short periplasmic loop, and leader peptidase, which has an extended periplasmically located N‐terminal tail. For both proteins we find that the membrane potential promotes membrane transfer only when negatively charged residues are present within the translocated domain. When these residues are substituted by uncharged amino acids, the proteins insert into the membrane independently of the potential. In contrast, when a positively charged residue is present within the N‐terminal tail of leader peptidase, the potential impedes translocation of the tail domain. However, an impediment was not observed in the case of the procoat protein, where positively charged residues in the central loop are translocated even in the presence of the membrane potential. Intriguingly, several of the negatively charged procoat proteins required the SecA and SecY proteins for optimal translocation. The studies reported here provide insights into the role of the potential in membrane protein assembly and suggest that electrophoresis can play an important role in controlling membrane topology.
Previously we have shown that the first hydrophobic domain of leader peptidase (lep) can function to translocate a short N‐terminal 18 residue antigenic peptide from the phage Pf3 coat protein across the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli. We have now examined the mechanism of insertion of N‐terminal periplasmic tails and have defined the features needed to translocate these regions. We find that short tails of up to 38 residues are efficiently translocated in a SecA‐ and SecY‐independent manner while longer tails are very poorly inserted. Efficient translocation of a 138 residue tail is restored and is Sec‐dependent by the addition of a leader sequence to the N‐terminus of the protein. We also find that while there is no amphiphilic helix requirement for N‐terminal translocation, there is a charge requirement that is needed within the tail; an arginine and lysine residue can inhibit or completely block translocation when introduced into the tail region. Intriguingly, the membrane potential is required for insertion of a 38 residue tail but not for a 23 residue tail.
Type I signal peptidase (SPase I) catalyzes the cleavage of the amino-terminal signal sequences from preproteins destined for cell export. Preproteins contain a signal sequence with a positively charged n-region, a hydrophobic h-region, and a neutral but polar c-region. Despite having no distinct consensus sequence other than a commonly found c-region "Ala-X-Ala" motif preceding the cleavage site, signal sequences are recognized by SPase I with high fidelity. Remarkably, other potential Ala-X-Ala sites are not cleaved within the preprotein. One hypothesis is that the source of this fidelity is due to the anchoring of both the SPase I enzyme (by way of its transmembrane segment) and the preprotein substrate (by the h-region in the signal sequence) in the membrane. This limits the enzyme-substrate interactions such that cleavage occurs at only one site. In this work we have, for the first time, successfully isolated Bacillus subtilis type I signal peptidase (SipS) and a truncated version lacking the transmembrane domain (SipS-P2). With purified full-length as well as truncated constructs of both B. subtilis and Escherichia coli (Lep) SPase I, in vitro specificity studies indicate that the transmembrane domains of either enzyme are not important determinants of in vitro cleavage fidelity, since enzyme constructs lacking them reveal no alternate site processing of pro-OmpA nuclease A substrate. In addition, experiments with mutant pro-OmpA nuclease A substrate constructs indicate that the h-region of the signal peptide is also not critical for substrate specificity. In contrast, certain mutants in the c-region of the signal peptide result in alternate site cleavage by both Lep and SipS enzymes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.