ObjectivesTo evaluate the validity of Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) prognostic scoring systems for Overall Survival (OS) in intracranial Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) of all patients diagnosed at a single center.Material and MethodsPretreatment clinical factors including tumor characteristics and histology, treatment, and survival of PCNSL patients with diagnostic biopsies over a 12‐year period (2003–2014) were retrieved from a prospective database at Oslo University Hospital.ResultsSeventy‐nine patients with intracranial PCNSL were identified. The female:male ratio was 1:1.63 and the median age was 65.3 years [range 18.9–80.7]. Involvement of deep brain structures was shown in 63 patients. Six patients were MSKCC risk group 1, 35 patients were in risk group 2, and 38 patients were in risk group 3. International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group scores were <2 in 17 patients (22%). After a median follow‐up of 70.5 months, 55 patients were dead. Median OS was 16.4 months [range 0.2–157.7]. Age, sLDH by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (ECOG), lesion size, involvement of deep brain structures, IELSG score, and MSKCC score were significant factors for OS in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed the significance of age (p < .05), sLDH by RPA (p < .005), ECOG (p < .05), and deep brain structure involvement (p < .05) for OS. The six‐tiered IELSG scores had to be dichotomized according to RPA analysis into <2 and ≥2 in order to have prognostic value. In contrast, when using the three‐tiered MSKCC, three distinct risk groups were identified.ConclusionsOur study failed to verify the IELSG, but validated the use of MSKCC for prognostication of OS in intracranial PCNSL.

This aimed to evaluate the effect of surgery for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in intracranial primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) of all patients diagnosed at a single center. A prospective database at Oslo University Hospital of PCNSL was reviewed over a 12-year period (2003-2014). Seventy-nine patients with intracranial PCNSL were identified. Deep brain involvement was shown in 63 patients. Thirty-two patients underwent craniotomy with resection, while all other patients had a biopsy. Fifty-seven patients were given chemotherapy: 18 were treated with the MSKCC (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) with rituximab, 21 with the MSKCC without rituximab, and 14 within a Nordic prospective phase II protocol. Forty-four patients achieved complete response (CR) and had OS of 46.3 months. Patients who underwent resection had a median OS of 28.6 versus 11.7 months for those who had a biopsy performed. Resection showed an insignificant prolongation of OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed statistical significance of deep brain involvement only (p < 0.005). Neither chemotherapy regimen, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), type of surgery, nor patient age was significant factors for OS or PFS. Resective surgery played no role in significantly improving either OS or PFS and therefore it is not recommended as treatment for PCNSL.

In intracranial PCNSL, the only significant prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis was age and deep brain involvement. While contingent on a small study sample, we hypothesize this may in part be explained by regional differences in vascular supply and delivery from a dysfunctional perfusion signature.

In univariate analysis, the MSKCC with RTX achieved significantly longer median OS compared to the Nordic protocol. However, in multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factor for survival of statistical significance was deep brain involvement.