No abstract

author made a final coding determination. Following the study period, a survey distributed to residents and faculty assessed attitudes towards the synchronous online discussions.Results: The qualitative analysis of the transcripts identified 2352 coded messages. The final coding schema can be seen in Figure 1. Of 1720 identified content codes, the most commonly identified themes were cultural communications (40.8%) and knowledge sharing (39.0%). Within the broader theme of knowledge sharing, participants were most likely to share individual practice experience (366/671 codes). Statements with uncited data/evidence (113 codes) occurred in similar frequency to sharing of academic resources (137 codes).Questions directed towards other members of the audience (48.8% of questions) were only slightly less common than questions directed to the lecturer (51.2% of questions). There were 56 respondents to the survey (30 residents, 25 faculty, 1 fellow). Of the 44 respondents that had presented didactics, 54.5% (24/44) identified that it was challenging to keep up with the synchronous online discussion. From the perspective of the audience, 82.1% (46/56) felt it was easy to keep up with the discussion. Presenters of didactics felt identifying a member of the audience as a surrogate was the easiest means to keep up with the discussion (75%, 33/44 presenters). Audience members agreed that they were much more likely to ask a question in a synchronous online discussion as opposed to speaking out loud (71.4%, 40/56).Conclusions: Weekly academic conferences are a critical component of residency education, enabling not only the acquisition of knowledge but also the social sharing of knowledge/experiences developing of robust communities of practice. Our qualitative analysis found that cultural communication occurred with near equal frequency to knowledge sharing and that sharing of individual practice experiences was more common than sharing of academic resources. These synchronous online discussions may make it more likely for audience members to ask questions of each other or the lecturer but keeping up with the discussion was challenging for lecturers.

No abstract