This report describes our 5-year experience with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the thyroid in a 560-bed teaching hospital. Three hundred nine FNA biopsies were performed primarily by one endocrinologist and interpreted by several pathologists. Analysis of the data reveals the sensitivity of the procedure is 93%, specificity is 95.1%, and the positive and negative predictive values are 88.9% and 96.5%, respectively. This data confirms the diagnostic accuracy of FNA biopsy. Complications were seen in 6 of 309 cases (1.9%) and were relatively mild. Nearly 75% of the cases in the series were cytologically diagnosed as nonneoplastic. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy identified 19.4% of the cases needing surgery, of which 72% had neoplastic nodules, confirming the selection role of the procedure. The management of thyroid nodules is discussed and a selective review of the FNA literature is presented. The authors believe that our experience rebuts the argument that special referral centers are needed to interpret the cytologic material. Several well trained surgical pathologists can become proficient in interpreting the FNA biopsies without significant loss in accuracy, and thereby render a definite diagnosis in the vast majority of the cases. Accordingly, the authors recommend FNA of the thyroid as the initial diagnostic test in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.

No abstract

We report the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytomorphologic features of six cases of primary mediastinal large-cell lymphoma with sclerosis. The series consisted of three men and three women with a median age of 36 yr. All the patients presented with a large anterior or superior mediastinal mass with no evidence of peripheral lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly. Two of the cases showed typical findings of lymphoma, characterized by hypercellular specimens with numerous individually scattered markedly atypical lymphoid cells present, demonstrating nuclear irregularity with the presence of nucleoli and surrounding scant to slight amount of cytoplasm. Numerous lymphoglandular bodies were seen in the background. Both cases were correctly diagnosed as representing non-Hodgkin's large-cell lymphomas. Two other cases had slight cellularity with the presence of a few scattered atypical lymphoid cells. Although a definite diagnosis was not rendered in either case, the possibility of malignant lymphoma was considered. Two other cases consisted predominantly of microtissue fragments with some associated scattered individual atypical cells. Within the microtissue fragments, the cells were distorted with a tendency to elongate and spindle in a prominent fibrous matrix. Our experience demonstrates that FNA cytology of primary mediastinal diffuse large cell lymphoma with sclerosis can be challenging, with a potential for a false-negative diagnosis due to limited cellularity secondary to the sclerosis or a misdiagnosis as a spindle cell neoplasm due to distortion of these cells by the fibrous matrix. To the best of our knowledge, we believe this is the first FNA series of primary mediastinal diffuse large cell lymphoma with sclerosis.

The fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of two cases of granulocytic sarcoma involving the breast is reported along with the FNA cytology of one case of myeloid metaplasia (extramedullary hematopoiesis) involving an axillary lymph node. Two patients had known myeloproliferative disorders, while granulocytic sarcoma of the breast was the initial presentation of an unsuspected acute granulocytic leukemia in the other patient. Diff-Quik-stained preparations aided in the diagnosis of all three cases. Immunoperoxidase stains for factor VIII-related antigen helped confirm the megakaryocytic differentiation of the cells in the FNA cytology of myeloid metaplasia. Electron microscopic (EM) examination performed on the aspirated material also showed megakaryocytic differentiation of the bizarre cells. FNA cytology can make a specific diagnosis of granulocytic sarcoma and myeloid metaplasia. The workup of these unusual extramedullary myeloproliferative masses was aided when immunocytochemistry and EM were performed on the aspirated material.

This report describes our experience with both fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies and large-needle biopsies (LNB) or core biopsies (CB) performed at the same time on 23 patients out of a series of 309 patients examined by the FNA technique. There was no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy of tissue obtained with the FNA technique when compared with the LNB or CB biopsy technique. While FNA always yielded tissue adequate for diagnosis, the LNB, and/or CB technique yielded tissue insufficient for diagnosis in four of 26 biopsies (15.4%). We believe that the FNA is better able to sample a mass with fewer insufficient specimens. Using FNA, the diagnosis can be rendered more rapidly, at lower cost, and with decreased potential for complications. The adequacy of the FNA biopsies can be assessed immediately using a modified Wright stain (Diff-Quik). Repeat biopsies can be performed that better sample the lesions with increased patient acceptance.