Objective. To construct a predictive signature based on autophagy-associated lncRNAs for predicting prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Materials and Methods. Differentially expressed autophagy genes (DEAGs) and differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) were screened between normal and LUAD samples at thresholds of ∣log2Fold Change∣>1 and P value < 0.05. Univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify overall survival- (OS-) associated DElncRNAs. The total cohort was randomly divided into a training group (n=229) and a validation group (n=228) at a ratio of 1 : 1. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to build prognostic models in the training group that were further validated by the area under curve (AUC) values of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in both the validation and total cohorts. Results. A total of 30 DEAGs and 2997 DElncRNAs were identified between 497 LUAD tissues and 54 normal tissues; however, only 1183 DElncRNAs were related to the 30 DEAGs. A signature consisting of 13 DElncRNAs was built to predict OS in lung adenocarcinoma, and the survival analysis indicated a significant OS advantage of the low-risk group over the high-risk group in the training group, with a 5-year OS AUC of 0.854. In the validation group, survival analysis also indicated a significantly favorable OS for the low-risk group over the high-risk group, with a 5-year OS AUC of 0.737. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that only positive surgical margin (vs negative surgical margin) and high-risk group (vs low-risk group) based on the predictive signature were independent risk factors predictive of overall mortality in LUAD. Conclusions. This study investigated the association between autophagy-associated lncRNAs and prognosis in LUAD and built a robust predictive signature of 13 lncRNAs to predict OS.

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) can be fatal if not treated promptly, and individual studies have reported wide variability in rates of VTE associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing PICC-related VTE in hospitalized patients.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until January 26, 2022. In studies with a non-comparison arm, the pooled incidence of PICC-related VTE was calculated. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated to assess the risk of VTE in the studies that compared PICC to the central venous catheter (CVC). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodological quality.ResultsA total of 75 articles (58 without a comparison arm and 17 with), including 109292 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of symptomatic VTE was 3.7% (95% CI: 3.1–4.4) in non-comparative studies. In the subgroup meta-analysis, the incidence of VTE was highest in patients who were in a critical care setting (10.6%; 95% CI: 5.0–17.7). Meta-analysis of comparative studies revealed that PICC was associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of VTE events compared with CVC (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.83–3.37; P &lt; 0.01). However, in subgroup analysis stratified by the study design, there was no significant difference in VTE events between the PICC and CVC in randomized controlled trials (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.77–6.74; P = 0.13).ConclusionBest practice standards such as PICC tip verification and VTE prophylaxis can help reduce the incidence and risk of PICC-related VTE. The risk-benefit of inserting PICC should be carefully weighed, especially in critically ill patients. Cautious interpretation of our results is important owing to substantial heterogeneity among the studies included in this study.

BACKGROUND Pulmonary benign metastatic leiomyoma (PBML), which is very rare, is a type of benign metastatic leiomyoma (BML). Here, we report a case of PBML, finally diagnosed through multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions, and provide a literature review of the disease. CASE SUMMARY A 55-year old asymptomatic woman was found to have bilateral multiple lung nodules on a chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan. Her medical history included total hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. The patient was diagnosed with PBML, on the basis of her clinical history, imaging manifestations, and computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous lung puncture biopsy, via MDT discussions. As the patient was asymptomatic, she received long-term monitoring without treatment. A follow-up of chest HRCT after 6 mo showed that the PBML lung nodules were stable and there was no progression. CONCLUSION For patients with a medical history of hysterectomy and uterine leiomyoma with lung nodules on chest CT, PBML should be considered during diagnosis based on the clinical history, imaging manifestations, CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture biopsy, and MDT discussions.

No abstract

BackgroundBRCA2 mutation has a more substantial impact on the homologous recombination and superior therapeutic response to platinum-based chemotherapy than BRCA1 mutation. Whether BRCA2-mutated patients could benefit more from PARPi than BRCA1-mutated patients remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy difference of PARPi between BRCA1 mutation carriers and BRCA2 mutation carriers.MethodsPubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PARPi that had available hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) in both BRCA1-mutated population and BRCA2-mutated population. We calculated the pooled PFS HRs and 95%CI using randomized-effect models, and the difference between the two estimates was compared by interaction test.ResultsA total of 11 eligible RCTs of high quality were identified through search. Overall, 1544 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 1191 BRCA2 mutation carriers were included in the final analysis. The pooled PFS HR was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.35-0.50) in BRCA1-mutated patients who were treated with PARPi compared with patients in the control group. In BRCA2-mutated patients treated with PARPi, the pooled PFS HR compared with the control groups was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.24-0.51). The difference in efficacy of PARPi was not significant between the two subgroups (Pheterogeneity = 0.40, for interaction).ConclusionBRCA1-mutated patients and BRCA2-mutated patients could benefit from PARPi, and the efficacy is comparable. Currently, there is no evidence that BRCA2-mutated patients would benefit more from PARPi than BRCA1-mutated patients.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42020214582.