Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) report worse functional status and quality of life hence the association has important clinical implications. FMS can be challenging to treat, and the current evidence recommends a multidisciplinary treatment approach focused on symptom management. Aim: Information regarding the current prevalence of FMS in RA patients is lacking. Thus, this study aims to address the prevalence and predictors of FMS in seropositive RA patients and demonstrate our clinical practice in the management of FMS. Methods: Participants’ data was gathered from Aseer central hospital (ACH) rheumatology clinics and daycare units over a period of 2 years. Subjects were assessed using the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for FMS. Data were collected from medical records, including patient demographics, comorbidities and concomitant FMS-related data. Results: Out of 310 seropositive RA patients, 15% (n = 47) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for FMS. Of them, 29, 11 and 7 were on pregabalin, amitriptyline and duloxetine, respectively. Half of FMS patients showed one or more therapy changes. A significant difference between RA patients with and without concomitant FMS was observed, including age, gender and comorbidities. Conclusion: In this retrospective study, a high prevalence of FMS in individuals with seropositive RA was identified. This study explores real-world practice in the treatment of FMS with remarkable findings regarding underdosing and lower discontinuation rate of pregabalin.
Background: Tofacitinib is the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several clinical trials have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in adult patients with moderately to severely active RA. Real-world studies provide invaluable insights into routine clinical practice. We aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of RA patients.Methods: Over a period of two years, we included 50 consecutive RA patients who were treated with tofacitinib. Clinical disease activity, assessed by disease activity score (DAS) 28 -erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), as well as adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.Results: A total of 50 patients (84% female) were enrolled in the study. The mean age at initiation of tofacitinib was 48.54 ± 15.97 years. The mean time of treatment with tofacitinib was 18.06 ± 2.04 months. Patients were treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID with 32% receiving tofacitinib as monotherapy. A total of 74% of the patients had been prescribed at least one biological treatment. The treatment target was achieved in 42 patients (82%). Baseline characteristics and previous treatment regimens did not predict clinical response to tofacitinib. Fifteen patients discontinued the treatment: seven due to ineffectiveness, four due to pregnancy, and five due to adverse events. The most common infectious adverse event was herpes zoster (4%) while the most common observed laboratory abnormalities were elevation in low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) in 6% and 8% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Our results indicate that tofacitinib is effective in real-world settings even as monotherapy. The treatment target was attained by 82% of the patients on tofacitinib. The safety profile of tofacitinib was generally consistent with previous studies.
Despite growing interest in computer-mediated collaborative writing (CMCW), very few studies have considered the effects of using a range of digital tools on learners’ behaviour. Our longitudinal study (15 weeks), conducted with Arabic as a second language learners in Saudi Arabia, investigated how learners engage in CMCW tasks using Google Docs and WhatsApp. The 31 participants formed eight dyads and five triads to complete four tasks. We analysed discussions and comments derived from Google docs and WhatsApp chats for patterns of interaction and use of online tools. Of five patterns of interaction identified, cooperative and collaborative predominated. Learners used the two tools simultaneously to foster collaboration. The findings provide new insights into CMCW tasks in an underexplored L2 learning context.
Purpose To study the pattern of response to different treatment strategies in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to describe our clinical practice in RA management. Patients and Methods Over a period of two years from April 2018 to April 2020, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 288 consecutive seropositive RA patients attending rheumatology clinics and the daycare unit at Aseer Central Hospital. Data were collected on patient demographics, disease duration, extraarticular manifestations, comorbidities and treatment. Disease activity was assessed using the clinical disease activity index (CDAI). Results Out of the total 288 patients, 42% (120) are on csDMRADs, while 54% (162) are on bDMRADs and 4% (6) are on tsDMARDs. Of the patients on csDMARDS, 51%, 43% and 7% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. However, of the patients on non-csDMARDS, 36.3%, 49.4% and 14.3% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. Failure of csDMARDs was affected by the presence of high disease activity at baseline, extraarticular lung manifestations and coexistent fibromyalgia, with a significant effect of the latter on remission rate. Among patients on non-csDMARDs, 42 (25%) showed one or more therapy changes. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the predominant first-line agents in biologically naive patients (65%) followed by abatacept (18%). Abatacept was the most frequently prescribed second biologic in 52% of cases followed by tocilizumab in 19%. Conclusion The current clinical practice in our hospital is consistent with the latest American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines. Treat-to-target strategy was achieved in the vast majority of our patients, while remission was observed in almost half of the patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.