Background
The entire human body is subject to changes associated with aging. Those occurring in the skin are visible, facial aging can be particularly negative since it represents the main image. Among the factors playing an important role in facial aging are exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light, smoking habits and alcohol consumption, which, together with genetic factors, can alter the rate of skin aging.
Objectives
The presented study aimed to compare the efficacy of the plasma filler and the non-cross linked hyaluronic acid in treating static forehead wrinkles.
Patients and Methods
The present study is a prospective study which included 20 adult male and female with different grades of static forhead wrinkles. Our participants range between 40 to 55 years old. This study was done in a period of 6 months starting from February 2019 to September 2019. All participant signed informed consent after explaining to them the objective of the study. An official research approval was granted from research ethical committee, faculty of medicine in Ain Shams University and fulfilled all the ethical aspects required in human research.
Results
So the plasma gel is as safe and efficient as non cross linked hyaluronic acid in treating static forehead wrinkles as there is no significant difference between the right and left forehead after treatment.
Conclusion
Plasma gel is as safe and effective as non cross-linked HA, plasma gel is cheap, available, easy promising tool to treat wrinkles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.