SummaryThis study assesses the performance of maternity care and its specific service components (preventive interventions in antenatal care, antenatal screening, referral, obstetric care) in Banke District, Nepal, using a set of structure, process, and output/outcome indicators. Data sources included health service documents in 14 first level health units and two hospitals, covering 1378 pregnancies and 1323 deliveries, structured observations, antenatal exit interviews (n ϭ 136) and interviews with maternity users (n ϭ 146). Coverage of antenatal care (28%) and skilled delivery care (16%) was low. In antenatal care, preventive interventions were only partially implemented (effective iron supplementation in 17% of users). On average one minute was spent on individual counselling per consultation. 41% of pregnancies were identified as high risk and 15% received referral advice, which was followed in only 32%. Hospital deliveries accounted for 9.8% of all deliveries. Hospital-based maternal mortality was 6.8/1000 births and the stillbirth rate 70/1000. High rates of stillbirth were observed in breech delivery (258/1000 births), caesarean section (143/1000) and twin delivery (133/1000). The risk of stillbirth was higher for rural women (RR 2.3; 95% CI 1.51-3.50) and appeared to be related to low socio-economic status. Emergency admissions were rare and accounted for 3.4% of hospital deliveries or only 0.4% of all expected deliveries. There was hardly any accumulation of high-risk pregnancies at hospital. The population-based rate of caesarean section was 1.1% (urban 2.3%, rural 0.2%). The estimated unmet obstetric need was high (82 cases or 61% of expected live-threatening maternal conditions did not receive appropriate intervention). The limited effectiveness of maternity care is the result of deficiencies of all service components. We propose a two-pronged approach by starting quality improvement of maternity care from both ends of maternity services: preventive interventions for all women and hospital-based obstetric care. Antenatal screening needs to be rationalized by reducing inflated risk catalogues that result in stereotypical and often rejected referral advice. keywords safe motherhood, health systems research, maternity care, quality of care, Nepal correspondence Dr Albrecht Jahn,
The objective of this study is to investigate the quality of drug prescriptions in nine health centres of three districts in rural Burkina Faso. 313 outpatient consultations were studied by methods of guided observation. Additionally interviews were held with the health care workers involved in the study. A total of 793 drugs prescribed by 15 health care workers during the observation period and 2815 prescribed drugs copied from the patient register were analyzed. An average of 2.3 drugs were prescribed per visit. 88.0% of the prescribed drugs were on the essential drug list. 88.4% were indicated according to the national treatment guidelines. 79.4% had a correct dosage. The study revealed serious deficiencies in drug prescribing that could not be detected by assessing selected quantitative drug-use indicators as recommended by the WHO. In two-thirds of the cases the patients received no information on how long the drug had to be taken. Errors in dosage occurred significantly more often in children under 5 years. The combined analysis of choice and dosage of drugs showed that 59.3% of all the patients received a correct prescription. Seven out of 21 pregnant women received drugs contraindicated in pregnancy. We conclude that assessment of quantitative drug-use indicators alone does not suffice in identifying specific needs for improvement in treatment quality. We recommend that prescribing for children under 5 and for pregnant women should be targeted in future interventions and that the lay-out, content and distribution of treatment guidelines must be improved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.