Although fewer patients will achieve complete resolution of symptoms as compared with outcomes following primary ARS, laparoscopic revision of ARS is a safe and effective approach for the revision of anti-reflux surgery in the early, emergency and elective settings.

Background: Social media has changed the way surgeons communicate worldwide, particularly in dissemination of trial results. However, it is unclear if social media could be used in recruitment to surgical trials. This study aimed to investigate the influence of Twitter in promoting surgical recruitment in The Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study. Methods: The ELF Study was a UK-based, prospective, observational cohort that aimed to assess the influence of frailty on 90-day mortality in older adults undergoing emergency surgery. A power calculation required 500 patients to be recruited to detect a 10% change in mortality associated with frailty. A 12-week recruitment period was selected, calculated from information submitted by participating hospitals and the numbers of emergency surgeries performed in adults aged > 65 years. A Twitter handle was designed (@ELFStudy) with eye-catching logos to encourage enrolment and inform the public and clinicians involved in the study. Twitter Analytics and Twitonomy (Digonomy Pty Ltd) were used to analyse user engagement in relation to patient recruitment. Results: After 90 days of data collection, 49 sites from Scotland, England and Wales recruited 952 consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, with data logged into a database created on REDCap. Target recruitment (n = 500) was achieved by week 11. A total of 591 tweets were published by @ELFStudy since its conception, making 218,136 impressions at time of writing. The number of impressions (number of times users see a particular tweet) prior to March 20th 2017 (study commencement date) was 23,335 (343.2 per tweet), compared to the recruitment period with 114,314 impressions (256.3 per tweet), ending June 20th 2017. Each additional tweet was associated with an increase in recruitment of 1.66 (95%CI 1.36 to 1.97; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ELF Study over-recruited by nearly 100%, reaching over 200,000 people across the U.K. Branding enhanced tweet aesthetics and helped increase tweet engagement to stimulate discussion and healthy competition amongst clinicians to aid trial recruitment. Other studies may draw from the social media experiences of the ELF Study to optimise collaboration amongst researchers.

Background The aim of this review was to analyse RCTs comparing wound-related outcomes between continuous subcuticular and interrupted transdermal wound closures for open appendicectomies in all age groups. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2020 (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Google Scholar, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). RCTs without restrictions on study language, year, status of publication, and patient age were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) for binary and continuous variables were calculated using random-effects models. A summary-of-findings table was generated to assess the level of evidence. Results Eleven trials were included (1781 patients analysed, 891 in continuous and 890 in interrupted groups). The overall rate of wound infection was 7.1 per cent. There was no significant difference in the risk of wound infection (11 trials, 1781 patients; RR 1.13, 95 per cent c.i. 0.77 to 1.66; P = 0.530) or wound exploration (7 trials, 1129 patients; RR 0.74, 0.41 to 1.34, P = 0.320) between the two groups. Continuous wound closure had a significantly reduced risk of wound dehiscence (6 trials, 865 patients; RR 0.16, 0.05 to 0.50; P = 0.002) and smaller wound scar (3 trials, 417 patients; MD –2.11 (95 per cent c.i. –2.57 to –1.66) mm; P &lt; 0.001). The absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat for wound dehiscence were 6.1 per cent and 16 respectively. There was no significant statistical heterogeneity for all outcomes (I2 0–15 per cent, χ2 P &gt; 0.100). Most RCTs had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Continuous subcuticular open appendicectomy wound closure is not associated with an increased risk of wound infection and exploration. This method of closure has a reduced risk of wound dehiscence and better cosmetic outcomes.

Background During rapid weight-loss phase following bariatric procedures, biliary cholesterol homeostasis is altered leading to increased propensity to gallstone formation. Incidence of gallstone formation following bariatric procedures is shown to be 10-38%. There is no consensus regarding its prevention and current BOMSS guidelines do not address this issue. This meta-analysis aims to pool high level evidence (RCTs) to assess efficacy of Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in reducing risk of gallstone formation in this cohort of patients and the need for revision of current guidelines. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, PROSPERO and Google Scholar) in line with PRISMA guidelines. Only randomised controlled trials were included without restrictions on study language, year, status of publication and patient’s age. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) using random-effects model. Results Fifteen trials were included (3952 patients analysed, 2487 in UDCA and 1465 in placebo group). The overall rate of gallstone formation was 16.0% (6.4% in UDCA vs 31.4% in placebo group). Trials included various bariatric procedures (SG/RYGB/OAGB/AGB/Gastroplasty). UDCA dose ranged from 300 to 1200mg per day. UDCA significantly reduced the risk of post-operative gallstone formation (3952 patients, RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.16-0.37, p &lt; 0.0001). The absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (NNT) were 25% and 4 respectively. Conclusions Oral Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment following restrictive bariatric surgical procedures significantly reduces the risks of gallstone formation. As such, its regular use in first 6 months (rapid weight-loss phase) can significantly reduce the risk of complications associated with gallstones. Such treatment would be cost effective and benefit 1 in 4 patients. There is significant evidence available on benefits of using UDCA in post-operative bariatric patients and that this should be added to the recent BOMSS guidelines.

Background Gastro-Intestinal Stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare neoplasms of mesenchymal origin that arise in the GI tract and account for approximately 0.1-3% of all GI tumours. The aim of this study was to determine whether the mode of clinical presentation of GISTs has an effect on outcome. Methods Consecutive 143 patients diagnosed with GISTs were identified from the regional network database (median age 67 (21-88) years, 85 male). Data were collected on presenting symptoms, tumour, treatment undertaken, and the primary outcome measure was survival. Results The commonest GIST anatomical sites were stomach (69.9%), small bowel (13.3%), and colon (4.9%). Commonest symptoms were abdominal pain (30.0%), dyspepsia (11.8%), and anaemia (11.1%). Symptomatic presentations were associated with older age (p = 0.056) and higher mitotic index (&gt;5 per 50HPF, p = 0.045). On univariable analysis the factors associated with cumulative 10-year survival were age (p = 0.076), the presence of symptoms (78.1% vs. 96.4%, p = 0.028), mitotic index (p = 0.011), and modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) prognostic index (p = 0.010), but not deprivation index, anatomical site or GIST diameter. Symptomatic patients aged over 60 years with mitotic index &gt;5 per 50 HPF had the poorest 10-year survival at 63.6% (HR 2.577, 95%CI 1.132-5.867). On multivariable analysis, NIH index (HR 4.283, 95%CI 1.395-13.149, p = 0.011) and age (HR1.061, 95%CI 1.006-1.118, p = 0.029) were independently associated with 10-year survival. Conclusions Age, symptoms, and NIH criteria represent the most important prognostic biomarkers in patients diagnosed with GISTs.