No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: The oculofacial plastic surgeon will more frequently encounter challenges related to overweight and obese patients as the incidence rises. There is a paucity of data in the oculofacial plastic surgical literature regarding this topic. The goal of this review is to detail the role obesity plays in the perioperative course and the considerations for a surgeon treating this patient population. Methods: The authors conducted a computerized search using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search terms used were “(obesity OR overweight) AND surgery,” “(obesity OR overweight) AND oculoplastic,” “(obesity OR overweight) AND oculofacial,” “(obesity OR overweight) AND ‘facial plastic surgery’, ” “(obesity OR overweight) AND ‘bariatric surgery’, ” “(obesity OR overweight) AND (pre-operative OR post-operative OR intraoperative,” “ (obesity OR overweight) AND complications,” “(obesity OR overweight) AND (facial plastic surgery) AND complications),” “(obesity OR overweight) AND eyelid,” “(obesity OR overweight) AND (nasolacrimal OR ‘nasolacrimal duct’),” “(obesity OR overweight) AND IIH,” “(obesity OR overweight) AND exophthalmos.” Results: A total of 127 articles, published from 1952 to 2022 in the English language or with English translations were included. Articles published earlier than 2000 were cited for foundational knowledge. References cited in the identified articles were also used to gather further data for the review. Conclusions: Overweight and obese patients pose specific challenges that the oculofacial plastic surgeon should be aware of to better optimize patient outcomes. Multiple comorbidities, poor wound healing, and nutritional deficits all contribute to the complications experienced in this patient population. Further investigation on overweight and obese patients is needed.

Purpose: We report a rare case of neurosensory retinal detachment (RD) in the setting of a giant retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear. Methods: A 58-year-old man presented with a macula-involving RD in the left eye. Exam revealed a neurosensory detachment inferiorly and RPE abnormalities temporally. Optical coherence tomography showed a large RPE tear and detachment in the temporal macula contiguous with a neurosensory RD. Results: No clear etiology was identified and failure of conservative management led to vitrectomy with RD repair. Follow-up intravenous fluorescein angiography 3 months postoperatively showed a large RPE window defect. Conclusions: RPE tears are common; however, concomitant neurosensory RD is rare. A thorough workup to determine treatable causative factors is necessary; in the event of idiopathic diagnosis, close follow-up is necessary to determine the need for surgery. Pars plana vitrectomy, external drainage of subretinal fluid, endolaser, and 5000-centistoke silicone oil placement were successful in this patient.

Précis: Ab externo transconjunctival placement of the Xen-45 gel stent offers a faster surgical approach and more rapid visual recovery with similar pressure-lowering and complication rates when compared with implantation by the ab interno approach. Purpose: Compare outcomes of closed conjunctival Xen-45 implantation techniques: ab interno versus ab externo transconjunctival. Material and Methods: Single-center, retrospective study of 70 patients undergoing Xen-45 implantation between 2017 and 2020. Group 1 (n=29) had ab interno placement, Group 2 (n=41) had transconjunctival ab externo placement. Primary outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication use. Secondary measures were bleb revision rates, surgical time, time to return to baseline visual acuity, and complication rates. Results: Group 1, preoperative IOP was 22.8±7.5 mmHg on 3.8±0.9 IOP-lowering medications and the postoperative IOP at last follow-up was 11.6±2.8 mmHg on 1.6±1.3 medications. Group 2, preoperative IOP was 25.6 mmHg±7.8 mmHg on 3.7±1.1 medications and the postoperative IOP at last follow-up was 12.4±3.6 mmHg on 1.5±1.3 medications. There was no difference in postoperative IOP or medications between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The average surgical time for Group 2 was 25±6.5 minutes to 37±7.3 minutes for Group 1 (P<0.001). Group 2 showed 88% of patients returning to baseline visual acuity at week 2 compared with 66% in Group 1 (P<0.05). Bleb revision rates, failure rates, and complication rates were comparable between both groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: IOP, medication use, complications, bleb revision rates, and failure rates were similar between ab interno and ab externo transconjunctival approaches. The ab externo group had faster surgical times and postoperative visual recovery despite higher number of patients with previous glaucoma procedures