Investigating students’ understanding of the concept of hydrostatic pressure is based on the importance of this understanding to be able to master static fluid material. This study uses qualitative methods to investigate the understanding of student concepts on the topic of hydrostatic pressure. The sample used in this study was 206 undergraduate student physics and undergraduate student physics education at Universitas Sebelas Maret, and Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. The results of the analysis show that ten items developed were declared valid in content based on expert judgment. This is evidenced by the acquisition of V index of 0.99, while the Vtable is 0.92. The reliability estimation results obtained by the value of person reliability (testee) of 0.82, and reliability items of 0.75. It can be concluded that the consistency of the answers from either the testee or from the item in question has high reliability. The results of the investigation showed that there were many undergraduate students after studying physics, not being able to understand even in the simplest parts. Some concepts have been misunderstood; this has led to undergraduate students considering physics as a difficult, complicated, and time-consuming science to be able to understand it.
This study aims to calibrate the instrument of argumentation skills on the subject of Fluid Statics using item response theory (IRT). The blueprint instrument developed based on the aspects and sub-aspects of argumentation skills, totaling 20 items. The scoring uses the Partial Credit Model (PCM) principle in 4 categories. Subjects involved in the study were 206 undergraduate students at two different universities. The validation of the instrument using expert judgment techniques, which consisted of linguists, physicists, and educational measurement experts. Instrument calibration for argumentation skills is carried out by (1) analysis of item fit with PCM by testing goodness of fit items, (2) testing prerequisite analysis, (3) reliability, (4) difficulty level, and (5) Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). The test developed is valid with Aiken V index values in the range 0.93 to 1. The analysis of IRT assumptions uses two parameters, the adequacy test of the sample and the factor analysis. The Chi-Square value in the Bartlett test is 2202.67 with df 190, and a p-value value (Sig.) <0.05 indicates that the sample size used has met the unidimensional requirements. The instrument developed has met the criteria for scoring the Polytomus items, based on a) the MNSQ INFIT value is in the range of 0.70 to 1.30, and b) the difficulty index test is in the range -2.00 <b <2.00. The results of the reliability estimate on the test equipment obtained a reliability value of 0.86, which means that the reliability of the test is in the high category. The graph of the information function and SEM converge on the ability scales of -2.8 and +1.5, meaning that the skills test kit argues it is suitable for testees in the low to moderate ability range.
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW PADA KREATIVITAS BIDANG PEMBELAJARAN SAINS: DOMAIN, TREND PENELITIAN, DAN ANALISISNYAAbstractCreativity is an important aspect to be developed in students and becomes one of the main skills needed in the world of work. This study aims to review the results of research on creativity in the field of science education which includes aspects of domains, research trends, and methods. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is carried out carefully and strictly on articles sourced from international reputable databases. The selection results obtained 22 articles published from 2010 to 2020. The perspective of creativity research lies in the 4Ps (Person, Process, Product, and Press) as a single component. The trend of creativity research is mostly related to multi-representation, concept understanding, evaluation, and creative learning design. In addition, research trends are explored to improve the creative processes and products of junior high and high school students, as well as several course institutions and elementary schools. While the most creative research methods use quasi-experimental and mixed methods. Research with a quasi-experimental design allows the measurement process before and after treatment. Researchers can find out whether the treatment has an effect on creativity in terms of the results of statistical tests.AbstrakKreativitas merupakan aspek penting untuk dikembangkan pada siswa dan menjadi salah satu keterampilan utama yang dibutuhkan di dunia kerja. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mereview hasil penelitian-penelitian tentang kreativitas bidang pendidikan sains yang meliputi aspek domain, trend penelitian, dan analisisnya. SLR dilakukan pada artikel-artikel yang bersumber dari database bereputasi internasional. Hasil seleksi diperoleh 22 artikel yang diterbitkan dalam rentang 2010 sampai 2020. Sudut pandang penelitian kreativitas terletak pada 4P (Person, Process, Product, dan Press) sebagai sebuah komponen satu kesatuan. Tren penelitian kreativitas paling banyak berkaitan dengan multirepresentasi, pemahaman konsep, evaluasi, dan desain pembelajaran kreativitas. Selain itu, trend penelitian melakukan eksplorasi untuk meningkatkan proses dan produk kreativitas siswa sekolah menengah pertama dan sekolah menengah atas, juga beberapa lembaga kursus dan sekolah dasar. Sedangkan teknik analisis data penelitian kreativitas paling banyak menggunakan quasi eksperimen dan metode campuran. Penelitian dengan desain quasi-eksperimental memungkinkan proses pengukuran sebelum dan sesudah treatment sehingga peneliti dapat mengetahui apakah perlakukan yang diberikan berpengaruh terhadap kreativitas berdasarkan hasil uji statistik. How To Cite: Sujatmika, S., Lestari, E.S., Affandy, H. (2022). Systematic Literature Review Pada Kreativitas Bidang Pembelajaran Sains: Domain, Trend Penelitian, dan Analisisnya. EDUSAINS, 14 (1) : 34-49.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.