Although two deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) viruses, pseudorabies (PsRV) and vaccinia, are as susceptible as a ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus, vesicular stomatitis (VSV), to interferon when tested in chicken or mouse cells, they are refractory to inhibition in interferon-treated primary rabbit kidney cells and in a continuous line (RK-13) of rabbit kidney cells. Superinfection with VSV of RK-13 cells first infected with PsRV completely blocks the replication of PsRV with no effect on VSV yield. When the same experiment is carried out in RK-1 3 cells pretreated with 1,000 units of interferon, VSV replication is inhibited, which permits PsRV to replicate normally. These findings demonstrate that in the same cell one virus (PsRV) can be refractory to interferon and a second virus (VSV) can be susceptible. These experiments show that rabbit kidney cell cultures are deficient in the synthesis of resistance factors active against the DNA viruses tested and raise the possibility that separate resistance factors may exist for RNA and DNA viruses. In the case of sequential infection of interferon-treated RK-13 cells with vaccinia and VSV, it was found that not only was vaccinia replication refractory to inhibition by interferon, but also that prior infection with vaccinia was able to partially reverse the effect of the inhibitor on the replication of the VSV used for superinfection. On the basis of these and other data it is postulated that a vaccinia virion component or a replication product of vaccinia virus, or both, enables VSV to escape the inhibiting action of interferoninduced resistance factors.

When the sensitivities to interferon of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) were compared by the plaque reduction method in chick embryo cell cultures, NDV was found to be 45-fold more resistant than VSV. This difference was exaggerated when a multiple-cycle yield inhibition method was employed. In marked contrast, when the same viruses were tested by a single-cycle yield inhibition method, the difference in sensitivity to interferon of the two viruses was virtually eliminated. Further investigation showed that, in chick embryo cells exposed to interferon, the resistance to NDV decayed more rapidly than resistance to VSV. This finding explained the divergent results obtained with the two viruses when singleor multiple-cycle replication techniques were employed. Experiments carried out with L cells showed that cellular antiviral resistance decayed much more slowly in these cells than in chick embryo cells. Consequently, when measured by the plaque reduction method in L cells, no difference was observed in the sensitivity to interferon of VSV and NDVpi, a mutant of NDV which replicates efficiently in L cells. A procedure is suggested for determining the relative sensitivities to interferon of different viruses under conditions which minimize the role of decay of antiviral resistance in the host cells.

No abstract

No abstract