No abstract

The substantial focus on achieving corporate sustainability has necessitated the implementation of green human resource management (GHRM) practices. The purpose of this paper is to reveal the industries’ perspective of the impact of GHRM practices (i.e., green recruitment and selection, green pay and rewards, and green employee involvement and green training) on corporate sustainability practices. Data were collected from 200 human resource professionals in major industrial sectors of a developing country. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was used to test the study hypotheses and multigroup analysis (MGA) between industrial sectors. The findings show a positive impact of three GHRM practices, i.e., green recruitment and selection, green pay and rewards, and green employee involvement on corporate sustainability. However, green training has no significant association with corporate sustainability, which is interesting. Furthermore, the multigroup analysis (MGA) revealed partial and significant differences among different sectors. The results provide more contextualized social, environmental, and economic implications to academics and practitioners interested in green initiatives. To date, limited research has been conducted to investigate whether GHRM practices can be an effective strategy in increasing corporate sustainability in a developing country context. Particularly, the industry’s perspective on the subject matter was rather absent in the existing literature. The present study fills this gap and contributes to the existing literature by providing the industry’s perspective on GHRM and corporate sustainability.

Most of the prior literature that investigated the nexus between corporate sustainability disclosures (CSD) and firm financial performance (FFP) has largely been ignored the potential problem of endogeneity. The omitted variable(s), measurement error, and reverse causality, which are the known causes of endogeneity, may also be the possible reasons for the indecisive and inconsistent relationship between CSD and FFP. Accordingly, this study reinvestigates the relationship by addressing the problem of endogeneity through applying the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator to data collected from the annual reports of the top 10 Pakistani banks through content analysis from 2013 to 2017. The results show a positive impact of the CSD and social sustainability on FFP. However, environmental sustainability exerted a negative impact on FFP. The statistics for 2SLS are much different than those of the ordinary least squares (OLS), which explain the importance of addressing the endogeneity bias. The study offers a methodological procedure that identifies and addresses the endogeneity through a step-by-step process in Stata 13.0. Besides, the study also has a novelty to propose and validate additional instrumental variables for the research in the future. Overall, the study has many contributions and implications for different stakeholders such as academia, regulatory bodies, and practitioners in the field of corporate sustainability.

This study aims to investigate the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosures (CSRD) on the financial performance of the Islamic banking industry of Pakistan. The study employed the method of content analysis for collecting the required data from annual reports of all four full-fledged Islamic banks operating in Pakistan from 2012 to 2017. The study developed a novel comprehensive CSRD index by using the “Global Reporting Initiative” (GRI) and “Accounting and Auditing Organization of Islamic Financial Institutions” (AAOIFI). This index consists of five dimensions and 105 sub-dimensions of CSRD. The use of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Panel Corrected Standard Errors (PCSEs), and Generalized Least Squares (GLS) using random-effect (RE) and fixed-effect (FE) estimators revealed a significant negative relationship between CSRD and the financial performance of the sample firms. Regarding separate dimensions, the relationship of the Environmental and Economic dimensions of CSRD is significantly positive with current performance, but it is insignificant for the relationships of Legal, Philanthropic, and Ethical dimensions of CSRD with the current financial performance. In addition to contributing to the scarce literature in the Islamic banking industry of a developing country like Pakistan, the study will also help the policymakers and other stakeholders, including the AAOIFI, to develop a comprehensive CSRD policy or index and further improve the already established standards for CSRD.

No abstract