Background Debates still surround using lipoproteins including Apo‐B in risk assessment, management, and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. During an acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, Apo‐B might help to achieve incremental prognostic information. Objective We sought to determine the potential prognostic utility of calculated Apo‐B in a cohort of patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted enrolling 2,259 patients with a diagnosis of acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI. Apo‐B was obtained using a valid equation based on initial lipid measurements. High Apo‐B was defined as a level of 65 or higher. Primary endpoint of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results Mean age of the participants was 59.54 years and 77.9% of them were male. After a Median follow up of 15 (6.2) months, high Apo‐B was associated with MACE and the OR (95% CI) was 3.02 (1.07–8.47), p = .036. Odds ratios for prediction of MACE pertaining to LVEF, and smoking were 0.97 (p = .044), and 1.07 (p = .033), respectively. However, High Apo‐B was not able to predict suboptimal TIMI flow. Accordingly, the Odds ratio was 0.56 (0.17–1.87), p = 0.349. The power of High LDL‐C and Non‐HDLC for prediction of MACE were assessed in distinct models. Attained odds ratios were [2.40 (0.90–6.36), p = .077] and [1.80 (0.75–4.35), p = 0.191], respectively. Conclusion Calculated Apo‐B appears to be a simple tool applicable for prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with STEMI superior to both Non‐HDLC and LDL‐C.

The pandemic of COVID-19 in worldwide causes recent millions of morbidity and mortality in all countries and is the most important challenge in the world in recent years. Coronavirus is a single-stranded RNA virus and infection with COVID-19 leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome, lung inflammation, cytokine storm, and death. The other complications include endothelial dysfunction, activation of coagulation, thromboembolic events, and vascular disease. Cardiovascular complications such as myocardial and stroke ischemia, pulmonary thromboembolism, systemic arterial, and deep vein thrombosis were reported. In this review, we presented immuno-pathological mechanisms and the effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system, heart, vessels, coagulation system, and molecular glance of immuno-inflammation to the COVID-19’s pathology on the cardiovascular system.

Background: Performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in a timely fashion is a crucial part of the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to evaluate the contributing factors to and the etiologies of a prolonged door-to-device (D2D) time. Methods:  In 2016, the D2D time was measured in all patients who were treated with PPCI at Tehran Hear Center. The major causes of a prolonged D2D time (>90 min) were determined. The second phase was then started in 2017 by focusing on the determined causes, and direct feedback was given to anyone having contributed to the delayed D2D time. The D2D time was compared between these 2 years. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.54±11.82 years, and 82.2% of them were men. The median D2D time decreased from 55 minutes (IQR25-75%: 40–82) in 2016 to 46 minutes (IQR25-75%: 34–70) in 2017 (P<0.001). In the first year, 79.8% of the patients had a D2D time of below 90 minutes; the figure rose to 84.1% of the patients in the second year (P=0.017). The first cause of a prolonged D2D time was missed ST-elevation in the first electrocardiogram by physician or nurse (8.4% of the cases). Along with a declining rate of missed STE to 6.7%, the median D2D time in the missed patients also decreased from 205 minutes to 177 minutes (P=0.011). The rate of ambulance arrival increased from 10.2% to 20.7% of the cases, and the median D2D time also declined from 45 (IQR25-75%: 34–55) to 34 (IQR25-75%: 25–55) in these patients (P<0.001). Conclusion: Even in the setting of a 24/7 on-site interventionist in the hospital, the dispatch system and prehospital electrocardiograms, along with regular assessment and feedback, may improve the D2D time.

No abstract

Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) as the treatment of choice for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should be rapidly performed. It is necessary to use preventive strategies during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, which is an ongoing global concern. However, critical times in STEMI management may be influenced by the implementation of infection control protocols. aims We aimed to investigate the impact of our dedicated COVID-19 PPCI protocol on time components related to STEMI care and catheterization laboratory personnel safety. A subendpoint analysis to compare patient outcomes at a median time of 70 days during the pandemic with those of patients treated in the preceding year was another objective of our study. methods Patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI were included in this study. Chest computed tomography (CT) and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) tests were performed in patients suspected of having COVID-19. A total of 178 patients admitted between February 29 and April 30, 2020 were compared with 146 patients admitted between March 1 and April 30, 2019. results Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was confirmed by rRT-PCR in 7 cases. In 6 out of 7 patients, CT was indicative of COVID-19. There were no differences between the study groups regarding critical time intervals for reperfusion in STEMI. The 70-day mortality rate before and during the pandemic was 2.73% and 4.49%, respectively (P = 0.4). conclusions The implementation of the dedicated COVID-19 PPCI protocol in patients with STEMI allowed us to achieve similar target times for reperfusion, short-term clinical outcomes, and staff safety as in the prepandemic era.