No abstract

PurposeThis study compared the accessory anteromedial portal (AAMP) and the modified transtibial technique (MTTT)” for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Patients and methodsSixty active adult patients with ACL tear were randomly assigned into two equal groups who were treated surgically. One group was operated on using AAMP and the other group through MTTT. Both the groups had the same postoperative course and were followed for 1 year after surgery. The follow-up included Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation forms, IKDC objective knee examination form, and radiological evaluation. Results were evaluated and compared with each other.ResultsThere was no significant difference in subjective effects or clinical examination between the two groups. Regarding radiological angles, the AAMP had more oblique graft orientation in the coronal plane than the MTTT, but both were found to be more slanted than native ACL. Also, the MTTT had succeeded to place the graft and tunnel more obliquity than the traditional non-anatomic TTT and better than the anatomic ranges despite having the graft inclination of the AAMP higher than the MTTT. The complaints from the patients and subjective scoring were found to be positively related to graft stability. Patients with healthier preoperative subjective state had a smoother postoperative period and better outcome.ConclusionThis study offers simple modifications to the transtibial technique to allow near anatomic ACL reconstruction with similar results comparable to the AAMP and with fewer complications.

No abstract

No abstract

Late presentation of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains a major orthopedic problem. However, existing management is not standardized and is highly surgeon dependent. The theory behind femoro-acetabular zones (FAZ) system is to find a relationship between acetabular maturity and severity of dislocation in one hand, and the outcome of closed reduction, on the other hand in late presenting cases. A retrospective study was performed on children with untreated DDH that underwent closed treatment. Our series consisted of 65 hips; mean patient age was 24 months (range: 9–30 months) with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. FAZ classification was applied to the pre-reduction pelvic radiograph, while the results were evaluated according to Severin’s scoring system. Overall, 37 of 65 hips (57%) achieved a satisfactory outcome (Severin I and II), while 22 hips (33%) were found to be unsatisfactory (Severin III). Six hips (10%) needed an open reduction. FAZ expressed a simple and reliable classification in predicting the success of closed reduction. This novel X-ray-based classification system can easily predict patients with DDH in whom a closed reduction is likely to succeed and defer patients with higher grades to surgical intervention. Yet, its validity has to be verified in larger cohort studies and directly compared to the established International Hip Dysplasia Institute classification.