Chromophore quench-labeling applied to 1-octene polymerization as catalyzed by hafnium-pyridyl amido precursors enables quantification of the amount of active catalyst and observation of the molecular weight distribution (MWD) of Hf-bound polymers via UV-GPC analysis. Comparison of the UV-detected MWD with the MWD of the "bulk" (all polymers, from RI-GPC analysis) provides important mechanistic information. The time evolution of the dual-detection GPC data, concentration of active catalyst, and monomer consumption suggests optimal activation conditions for the Hf pre-catalyst in the presence of the activator [PhC][B(CF)]. The chromophore quench-labeling agents do not react with the chain-transfer agent ZnEt under the reaction conditions. Thus, Hf-bound polymeryls are selectively labeled in the presence of zinc-polymeryls. Quench-labeling studies in the presence of ZnEt reveal that ZnEt does not influence the rate of propagation at the Hf center, and chain transfer of Hf-bound polymers to ZnEt is fast and quasi-irreversible. The quench-label techniques represent a means to study commercial polymerization catalysts that operate with high efficiency at low catalyst concentrations without the need for specialized equipment.

Which phosphines squeeze together? Phosphine ligands coordinated to palladium and nickel are essential tools for assembling the backbones of pharmaceutical compounds. For decades, descriptors that characterize spatial bulk have helped to guide phosphine optimization. However, these descriptors tend to apply to ideal geometries of a single ligand. Newman-Stonebraker et al . introduce a descriptor that considers how the ligand conformation might change in a crowded environment. Specifically, they found that the minimum percentage buried volume accurately predicts when one or two of a particular ligand will coordinate to a metal center, frequently a key determinant of successful catalysis. —JSY

We report the first insertion step at a metal center for the catalytic dehydropolymerization of H(3)B·NMeH(2) to form the simplest oligomeric species, H(3)B·NMeHBH(2)·NMeH(2), by the addition of 1 equiv of H(3)B·NMeH(2) to [Ir(PCy(3))(2)(H)(2)(η(2)-H(3)B·NMeH(2))][BAr(F)(4)] to give [Ir(PCy(3))(2)(H)(2)(η(2)-H(3)B·NMeHBH(2)·NMeH(2))][BAr(F)(4)]. This reaction is also catalytic for the formation of the free linear diborazane, but this is best obtained by an alternative stoichiometric synthesis.

A detailed catalytic, stoichiometric, and mechanistic study on the dehydrocoupling of H3B·NMe2H and dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 using the [Rh(Xantphos)](+) fragment is reported. At 0.2 mol % catalyst loadings, dehydrocoupling produces dimeric [H2B-NMe2]2 and poly(methylaminoborane) (M(n) = 22,700 g mol(-1), PDI = 2.1), respectively. The stoichiometric and catalytic kinetic data obtained suggest that similar mechanisms operate for both substrates, in which a key feature is an induction period that generates the active catalyst, proposed to be a Rh-amido-borane, that reversibly binds additional amine-borane so that saturation kinetics (Michaelis-Menten type steady-state approximation) operate during catalysis. B-N bond formation (with H3B·NMeH2) or elimination of amino-borane (with H3B·NMe2H) follows, in which N-H activation is proposed to be turnover limiting (KIE = 2.1 ± 0.2), with suggested mechanisms that only differ in that B-N bond formation (and the resulting propagation of a polymer chain) is favored for H3B·NMeH2 but not H3B·NMe2H. Importantly, for the dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2, polymer formation follows a chain growth process from the metal (relatively high degrees of polymerization at low conversions, increased catalyst loadings lead to lower-molecular-weight polymer), which is not living, and control of polymer molecular weight can be also achieved by using H2 (M(n) = 2,800 g mol(-1), PDI = 1.8) or THF solvent (M(n) = 52,200 g mol(-1), PDI = 1.4). Hydrogen is suggested to act as a chain transfer agent in a similar way to the polymerization of ethene, leading to low-molecular-weight polymer, while THF acts to attenuate chain transfer and accordingly longer polymer chains are formed. In situ studies on the likely active species present data that support a Rh-amido-borane intermediate as the active catalyst. An alternative Rh(III) hydrido-boryl complex, which has been independently synthesized and structurally characterized, is discounted as an intermediate by kinetic studies. A mechanism for dehydropolymerization is suggested in which the putative amido-borane species dehydrogenates an additional H3B·NMeH2 to form the "real monomer" amino-borane H2B═NMeH that undergoes insertion into the Rh-amido bond to propagate the growing polymer chain from the metal. Such a process is directly analogous to the chain growth mechanism for single-site olefin polymerization.

A systematic study of the catalyst structure and overall charge for the dehydropolymerization of HB·NMeH to form N-methyl polyaminoborane is reported using catalysts based upon neutral and cationic {Rh(Xantphos-R)} fragments in which PR groups are selected from Et, Pr, andBu. The most efficient systems are based upon {Rh(Xantphos-Pr)}, i.e., [Rh(κ-P,O,P-Xantphos-Pr)(H)(η-HB·NMe)][BAr], 6, and Rh(κ-P,O,P-Xantphos-Pr)H, 11. While H evolution kinetics show both are fast catalysts (ToF ≈ 1500 h) and polymer growth kinetics for dehydropolymerization suggest a classical chain growth process for both, neutral 11 (M = 28 000 g mol, Đ = 1.9) promotes significantly higher degrees of polymerization than cationic 6 (M = 9000 g mol, Đ = 2.9). For 6 isotopic labeling studies suggest a rate-determining NH activation, while speciation studies, coupled with DFT calculations, show the formation of a dimetalloborylene [{Rh(κ-P,O,P-Xantphos-Pr)}B] as the, likely dormant, end product of catalysis. A dual mechanism is proposed for dehydropolymerization in which neutral hydrides (formed by hydride transfer in cationic 6 to form a boronium coproduct) are the active catalysts for dehydrogenation to form aminoborane. Contemporaneous chain-growth polymer propagation is suggested to occur on a separate metal center via head-to-tail end chain B-N bond formation of the aminoborane monomer, templated by an aminoborohydride motif on the metal.