The organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) family of transporters has been implicated in prostate cancer disease progression probably by transporting hormones or drugs. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the expression, frequency, and relevance of OATPs as a biomarker in hormone-dependent cancers. We completed a study examining SLCO1B3, SLCO1B1 and SLCO2B1 mRNA expression in 381 primary, independent patient samples representing 21 cancers and normal tissues. From a separate cohort, protein expression of OATP1B3 was examined in prostate, colon, and bladder tissue. Based on expression frequency, SLCO2B1 was lower in liver cancer (P = 0.04) which also trended lower with decreasing differentiation (P = 0.004) and lower magnitude in pancreatic cancer (P = 0.05). SLCO2B1 also had a higher frequency in thyroid cancer (67%) than normal (0%) and expression increased with stage (P = 0.04). SLCO1B3 was expressed in 52% of cancerous prostate samples and increased SLCO1B3 expression trended with higher Gleason score (P = 0.03). SLCO1B3 expression was also higher in testicular cancer (P = 0.02). SLCO1B1 expression was lower in liver cancer (P = 0.04) which trended lower with liver cancer grade (P = 0.0004) and higher with colon cancer grade (P = 0.05). Protein expression of OATP1B3 was examined in normal and cancerous prostate, colon, and bladder tissue samples from an independent cohort. The results were similar to the transcription data, but showed distinct localization. OATPs correlate to differentiation in certain hormone-dependent cancers, thus may be useful as biomarkers for assessing clinical treatment and stage of disease.

No abstract

In this work, we combined computational protein-protein docking with computational and experimental mutagenesis to predict the structure of the complex formed by monoclonal antibody 806 (mAb 806) and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We docked mAb 806, an antitumor antibody, to its epitope of EGFR residues 287-302. Potential mAb 806-EGFR orientations were generated, and computational mutagenesis was used to filter them according to their agreement with experimental mutagenesis data. Further computational mutagenesis suggested additional mutations, which were tested to arrive at a final structure that was most consistent with experimental mutagenesis data. We propose that this is the EGFR-mAb 806 structure, in which mAb 806 binds to an untethered form of the receptor, consistent with published experimental results. The steric hindrance created by the antibody near the EGFR dimer interface interferes with receptor dimerization, and we postulate this as the structural origin for the antitumor effect of mAb 806.

197 Background: Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer among men in the United States, and its progression is largely controlled by the androgen receptor (AR). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an initially effective treatment for prostate cancer, but most tumors eventually become castrate resistant. Tumor hypoxia also appears to be associated with a poor prognosis in prostate cancer. HIF-1a regulates the transcription of genes that allow tumor survival and growth in low oxygen conditions. Our laboratory has data showing that in response to castration and anti-androgen therapy in mice, there was a strong transcriptional relationship between HIF-1a and AR, as measured by quantitative RT-PCR, suggesting an interaction between the two proteins. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine if there is a molecular interaction between HIF-1a and AR in prostate cancer cells. Methods: We used Western blot analysis to examine the expression levels of HIF-1a and AR in LNCaP prostate cancer cells to determine if they are upregulated together at the protein level. Four experimental conditions were tested: control (no treatment), DHT for induction of AR expression, CoCl2 for induction of HIF-1a, and a combination treatment of DHT and CoCl2. Immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out to determine if there is an association between HIF-1a and AR. In addition, cells were fractionated into nuclear and cellular cells extracts, followed by Western blot analysis to determine where in the cells this interaction occurs. Results: Western blot analysis of cell lysates showed synergistic upregulation of both HIF-1a and AR expression only under combined CoCl2 and DHT treatment conditions. In addition, immunoprecipitation experiments showed that HIF-1a and AR exist in a complex with one another, and fractionation experiments indicated this complex occurs in the nucleus. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that HIF-1a and AR associate with one another in cells. Binding assays are in progress to determine the nature of this interaction. In addition, we are examining the cellular consequences of this protein interaction, as it is possible that upregulation of HIF-1a in response to low androgen contributes to the development of tumor resistance to ADT.