Aim:To investigate the possible effect of haemodialysis (HD) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of evogliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor.Methods: A single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study of eight end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and eight matched healthy subjects was conducted. ESRD patients received a single oral dose of evogliptin 5 mg after and before HD with a 2-week washout between each dose, and healthy subjects received a single oral dose of evogliptin 5 mg. Serial blood, dialysate, and urine samples were collected to assess the PK and PD profiles of evogliptin. To compare PK parameters before and after HD, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results:The GMRs for the maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable timepoint (AUC last ) of evogliptin when administered before HD compared with after HD were 0.7293 (90% CI 0.6171-0.8620) and 0.9480 (90% CI 0.8162-1.1010), respectively. The maximum DPP-4 inhibitory effect, area under the DPP-4 inhibitory effect-time curve, and time duration of more than 80% DPP-4 inhibition were comparable when evogliptin was administered before and after HD. Compared with healthy subjects, the mean AUC last of evogliptin was approximately 1.4-fold greater in ESRD patients, but the difference is unlikely to affect the safety and efficacy of evogliptin. Conclusion:The effect of HD on the PK and PD characteristics of evogliptin was not clinically significant; therefore, dose adjustment according to HD status is not necessary.

Fetal tachycardia (FT) is a rare disorder and is associated with significant mortality of fetus. Digoxin is one of the antiarrhythmic agents used to treat FT via transplacental therapy. In this report, we describe a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) case of digoxin during the treatment of FT. A 40-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 1, hospitalized to control FT as the fetal heart rate (FHR) showed over 200 bpm on ultrasonography at 29 weeks of gestation. She did not have any medical or medication history and showed normal electrolytes level on clinical laboratory test results. For the treatment of FT loading and maintenance dose of intravenous digoxin (loading dose: 0.6 mg; maintenance dose: 0.3 mg every 8 hours) were administered. To monitor the efficacy and safety of the treatment, TDM was conducted with a target maternal serum trough digoxin concentration of 1.0 to 2.0 ng/mL, as well as ultrasonography and maternal electrocardiogram. The observed digoxin serum concentrations were 0.67, 0.83, and 1.05 ng/mL after 1, 2, and 5 days after the initiation of digoxin therapy, respectively. Although the serum digoxin concentrations reached the target range, the FHR did not improve. Therefore, digoxin was discontinued, and oral flecainide therapy was started. The FHR adjusted to the normal range within 2 days from changing treatment and remained stable. TDM of digoxin along with the monitoring of clinical responses can give valuable information for decision-making during the treatment FT.