No abstract

Elderly patients have a poorer risk profile compared with younger HL patients and experience more severe treatment-associated toxicity. Higher mortality during treatment as well as lower dose-intensity are the major factors explaining the poorer overall outcome of elderly HL patients.

No abstract

In contrast to younger patients, the prognosis of elderly patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD) has not improved substantially over the last 20 years. We thus carried out a prospectively randomized study (HD9(elderly)) to compare the BEACOPP regimen in this setting against standard COPP-ABVD. Between February 1993 and 1998, 75 patients aged 66-75 years with newly diagnosed HD in advanced stages were recruited into the HD9 trial as a separate stratum (HD9(elderly)). Patients were assigned to eight alternating cycles of COPP and ABVD or eight cycles of BEACOPP in baseline doses. Radiotherapy was given to initial bulky or residual disease. In total, 68 of 75 registered patients were assessable: 26 were treated with COPP-ABVD and 42 with BEACOPP baseline. There were no significant differences between COPP-ABVD and BEACOPP in terms of complete remission (76%), overall survival (50%) and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) (46%) at 5 years. At a median follow-up of 80 months, a total of 37 patients died: 14/26 patients (54%) treated with COPP-ABVD and 23/42 patients (55%) with BEACOPP. Two patients (8%) treated with COPP-ABVD and nine patients (21%) treated with BEACOPP died of acute toxicity. Hodgkin-specific FFTF at 5 years was 55% after COPP-ABVD and 74% after BEACOPP (P=0.13). Thus, there are no differences in survival between these regimens in elderly patients.

The CC thymus and activation-related chemokine (TARC) is a protein, which is highly expressed by Reed-Sternberg cells in Hodgkin's disease and is found in the majority of Hodgkin's disease patients. Within several trials conducted by the German Hodgkin study group, 62 Hodgkin's disease patients were elected based on availability of serum samples post and prior therapy to assess TARC levels by ELISA. TARC levels from 33 patients with continuous complete response (CCR), 20 patients with relapse, and nine patients with progressive disease (PD) were correlated with freedom from treatment failure and survival. As defined in healthy donors (mean value F 2Â SD), a TARC level of >500 pg/mL was considered as elevated. The median TARC levels of all patients at baseline and after completed primary treatment were 5,803 pg/mL (range, 116-73,074 pg/mL) and 663 pg/mL (50-24,709 pg/mL), respectively. TARC levels of patients with PD were higher than those of patients with CCR at baseline and after therapy. Baseline TARC correlated significantly with stage (P = 0.019), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.004), leukocyte count (P < 0.001), and lymphocyte count (P = 0.026). A TARC level of >2,000 pg/mL after completed treatment was a significant risk factor for poorer survival (P = 0.02) but not for relapse. In conclusion, monitoring serum TARC levels in Hodgkin's disease patients may add valuable information about therapy success in Hodgkin's disease patients, especially those with PD and should therefore be prospectively evaluated in future trials. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(13): 5516-9)