The microwave scatterometer is one of the most effective instruments in ocean remote sensing, which urges the need for some theoretical models to accurately estimate the scattering coefficient of the sea surface. For the simulation of the scattering from an ocean surface, the sea spectrum, or its inverse Fourier transform, autocorrelation function is essential. Currently, many sea spectral models have been proposed for describing sea waves. However, which spectrum should be adopted during electromagnetic (EM) computations? A systematic comparison of these models is needed to evaluate their accuracies. In this paper, we focus on numerical simulations of scattering from a rough sea surface in monostatic and bistatic configurations by using six different sea spectral models and the first-order small slope approximation (SSA-1). First, sea spectral models proposed by Elfouhaily et al., Hwang et al., Romeiser et al., Apel et al., Fung et al., and Pierson et al., are compared with each other from different points of view, e.g., the omnidirectional parts, the angular spreading functions, the autocorrelation functions, and the slope variances. We find that the spectra given by Elfouhaily and Hwang could reflect realistic wind sea waves more accurately. Then, the scattering coefficients are simulated in fully monostatic and bistatic configurations. Regarding the monostatic scattering, the results simulated using EM scattering models are compared with those obtained from the measured UAVSAR data in the L band and the empirical model CMOD5 in the C band. Comparisons are made for various incident angles, wind speeds, and wind directions. Meanwhile, special attention is paid to low to moderate incident angles. The comparisons show that, it is difficult to find one certain spectral model to simulate scattering coefficient accurately under all wind speeds or wind directions. Accurate estimations will be obtained using different methods according to different situations.
The aim of this work is to study the impacts of the oil spills on the electromagnetic scattering of the ocean surfaces in bistatic and monostatic configurations. Therefore, in this paper, we will study the influence of the pollutants (oil spills) on the physical and geometrical properties of sea surface. In recent literature, the study of the electromagnetic scattering from contaminated sea surface (sea surface covered by oil spill) was limited in monostatic case. In this paper, we will study this effect in bistatic configuration, which is interested in presence of pollution in sea surface. Indeed, we will start the numerical analysis of the bistatic scattering coefficients of a clean sea surface. Then, we will study the electromagnetic signature from sea surface covered by oil spills in bistatic case using the numerical Forward-Backward Method (FBM). The obtained numerical simulation of bistatic scattering coefficients of clean and contaminated sea surface is studied as a function of various parameters (frequency, incident angle, sea state, type of pollutant…). And the obtained results are also compared with those published in the literature, including those using asymptotic methods.
International audienceThis paper presents a numerical and experimental study of RCS of canonical and complex targets using Gaussian Beam Summation (GBS) method. The purposed GBS method has several advantages over ray method, mainly on caustic problem. To test and evaluate the performance of the chosen method, we start the analysis of the RCS using GBS, the asymptotic models Physical Optic (PO), Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD) and the rigorous Method of Moment (MoM). Then, we show the experimental validation of the numerical results using well calibrate measurements of radar targets. These experimental measurements have been carried out in our anechoic chamber (at ENSTA Bretagne). The numerical and experimental results of the RCS are studied and given as a function of various parameters: polarization type, target size, Gaussian beams number and Gaussian beams width
The aim of this paper is to study the Radar Cross Section (RCS) of modified radar targets (plate with notch) using Gaussian Beam techniques. The Gaussian methods used in this work are Gaussian Beam Summation (GBS) and Gaussian Beam Launching (GBL). We establish the theoretical formulation of the GBS and GBL techniques and analyze the influence of the main Gaussian beam parameters on the variation of the scattered field. Then, we present the simulations of RCS. The numerical results are compared with PO, MoM methods, and also with experimental measurements performed in the anechoic chamber at Lab-STICC (ENSTA Bretagne).
International audienceAmong the different available wind sources, i.e. in situ measurements, numeric weather models, the retrieval of wind speed from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data is one of the most widely used methods, since it can give high wind resolution cells. For this purpose, one can find two principal approaches: via electromagnetic (EM) models and empirical (EP) models. In both approaches, the Geophysical Model Functions (GMFs) are used to describe the relation of radar scattering, wind speed, and the geometry of observations. By knowing radar scattering and geometric parameters, it is possible to invert the GMFs to retrieve wind speed. It is very interesting to compare wind speed estimated by the EM models, general descriptions of radar scattering from sea surface, to the one estimated by the EP models, specific descriptions for the inverse problem. Based on the comparisons, some ideas are proposed to improve the performance of the EM models for wind speed retrieval
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.