IntroductionGadoxetic acid–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes to evaluating the prognosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) following treatment. We have investigated the potential role of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI based on LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) v2018 imaging features in the prognosis prediction of patients with sHCC treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as the first-line treatment and formulated a predictive nomogram.MethodsA total of 204 patients with sHCC who all received RFA as the first-line therapy were enrolled. All patients had undergone gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI examinations before RFA. Uni- and multivariable analyses for RFS were assessing using a Cox proportional hazards model. A novel nomogram was further constructed for predicting RFS. The clinical capacity of the model was validated according to calibration curves, the concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analyses.ResultsAlpha fetoprotein (AFP) > 100 ng/ml (HR, 2.006; 95% CI, 1.111–3.621; P = 0.021), rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (HR, 2.751; 95% CI, 1.511–5.011; P = 0.001), and targetoid restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (HR, 3.289; 95% CI, 1.832–5.906; P < 0.001) were considered as the independent risk features for recurrence in patients with sHCC treated with RFA. The calibration curves and C-indexes (C-index values of 0.758 and 0.807) showed the superior predictive performance of the integrated nomogram in both the training and validation groups.DiscussionThe gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI features based on LI-RADS v2018, including rim APHE, targetoid restriction on DWI, and the AFP level, are the independent risk factors of recurrence in patients with sHCC treated with RFA as the first-line therapy. The predictive clinical-radiological nomogram model was constructed for clinicians to develop individualized treatment and surveillance strategies.
OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnostic value of real-time ultrasound shear wave elastography (US-SWE) in evaluating the histological stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a rabbit model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one 8-week-old rabbits were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet (experimental groups), and seven rabbits were fed a standard diet (control group). All rabbits underwent real-time US-SWE at various time points to document the histological stages of NAFLD. We categorized the histological stages as normal, NAFL, borderline nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and NASH. We measured the elastic modulus of the liver parenchyma and analyzed the diagnostic efficacy of real-time US-SWE using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the four histological stages. RESULTS: The mean, minimum, and maximum elastic modulus increase for NAFL, borderline NASH, and NASH. For the mean, minimum, and maximum elastic modulus, AUCs are 0.891 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.716–0.977), 0.867 (95% CI: 0.686–0.965), and 0.789(95% CI:0.594–0.919) for differentiating normal liver from liver with NAFLD, respectively; AUCs are 0.846 (95% CI: 0.660–0.954), 0.818 (95% CI: 0.627–0.937), and 0.797(95% CI:0.627–0.913) for differentiating normal liver or liver with NAFL from liver with borderline NASH or NASH, respectively; AUCs are 0.889 (95% CI: 0.713–0.976), 0.787 (95% CI: 0.591–0.918), and 0.895 (95% CI:0.720–0.978) for differentiating liver with NASH from liver with lower severity NAFLD or normal liver, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time US-SWE is an accurate, noninvasive technique for evaluating the histological stages of NAFLD by measuring liver stiffness. We recommend using the mean elastic modulus to differentiate the histological stages, with the minimum and maximum elastic modulus as valuable complements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.