Serum N-acetyl-aspartate appears to be an early peripheral marker of ischaemically affected brain neurones, and the ratio of N-acetyl-aspartate to a protein marker, such as NSE, may serve as an index of irreversibility.
Recently introduced PET systems using silicon photomultipliers with digital readout (dPET) have an improved timing and spatial resolution, aiming at a better image quality, over conventional PET (cPET) systems. We prospectively evaluated the performance of a dPET system in patients with cancer, as compared to high-resolution (HR) cPET imaging. Methods: After a single FDG-injection, 66 patients underwent dPET (Vereos, Philips Healthcare) and cPET (Ingenuity TF, Philips Healthcare) imaging in a randomized order. We used HR-reconstructions (2x2x2 mm 3 voxels) for both scanners and determined SUVmax, SUVmean, lesion-to-background ratio (LBR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and lesion diameter in up to 5 FDG-positive lesions per patient. Furthermore, we counted the number of visible and measurable lesions on each PET scan. Two nuclear medicine specialists blindly determined the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) score from both image sets in 30 patients referred for initial staging. For all 66 patients, these specialists separately and blindly evaluated image quality (4-point scale) and determined the scan preference. Results We included 238 lesions that were visible and measurable on both PET scans. We found 37 additional lesions on dPET in 27 patients (41%), which were unmeasurable (n=14) or invisible (n=23) on cPET. SUVmean, SUVmax, LBR and MTV on cPET were 5.2±3.9 (mean±SD), 6.9±5.6, 5.0±3.6 and 2991±13251 mm 3 , respectively. On dPET SUVmean, SUVmax and LBR increased 24%, 23% and 27%, respectively (p<0.001) while MTV decreased 13% (p<0.001) compared to cPET. Visual analysis showed TNM upstaging with dPET in 13% of the patients (4/30). dPET images also scored higher in image quality (p=0.003) and were visually preferred in the majority of cases (65%). Conclusion Digital PET improved the detection of small lesions, upstaged the disease and images were visually preferred as compared to high-resolution conventional PET. More studies are necessary to confirm the superior diagnostic performance of digital PET.
Technetium-99m mercaptoacetylglycine (99mTc-MAG3) renography is a successful non-invasive method for the evaluation of renal transplants. In this study we prospectively studied 256 patients after renal transplantation, using the MAG3 uptake capacity in the first 10 min (MUC10), which is an index of renal function representing kidney activity as a fraction of the injected dose. Renal scintigraphy was performed in all patients within 48 h of transplantation. Renograms were obtained over 20 min, after bolus injection of +/-100 MBq 99mTc-MAG3. MUC10 ranged between 0.0 and 94.9. The patients were divided into five groups: group 1, MUC10 <1; group 2, 1< or =MUC10 < 5; group 3, 5 < or = MUC10 <10; group 4, 10 < or = MUC10 < 30; group 5, MUC10 > or =30. In 235 patients, follow-up for 5 years was completed. Considering all the renal transplants, 30% of the grafts ceased functioning within the first 5 years. Six grafts showed a MUC10 of < 1, and none survived the first year. After 5 years, 43% of the grafts with a MUC10 of 1-5 still functioned, as compared with 63% of those with a MUC10 of 5-10, 72% of those with a MUC10 of 10-30 and 83% of those with a MUC10 of > or =30. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant differences between the five different patient groups based on MUC10 in terms of the percentage of kidneys that ceased to function within 5 years. The period of cold ischaemia and the donor age were known in 178 patients. In contrast to cold ischaemia time, the MUC10 and the donor age showed a significant effect (P<0.05) on graft survival. This study indicates that the MUC10 early after renal transplantation is useful as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of kidney transplants and that a MUC10 of <1 indicates a dismal prognosis for the renal transplant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.