No abstract

The influence of viewing time on the detectability of subtle and obvious lung cancers was studied. Frontal chest radiographs of 40 patients with subtle cancers, 40 patients with obvious cancers, and 40 healthy control subjects were shown to four observers for four different viewing times (0.25 second, 1 second, 4 seconds, and unlimited time). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the detectability of lesions. Performance was degraded as viewing time decreased. The true-positive fractions for subtle and obvious cancers were 30% and 70% at 0.25 second and 74% and 98% at unlimited viewing time, respectively, for a given false-positive fraction of 20%. Thus, even with unlimited viewing time, the false-negative fraction for subtle cancers was 26%. The difference in detectability between subtle and obvious lung cancers was exaggerated at 1.0 second compared with 4 seconds and unlimited viewing time. The following conclusions were reached: (a) a substantial proportion of subtle lung lesions are missed, even with unlimited viewing time; (b) a large proportion of obvious lung cancers are detected with flash viewing; (c) the detectability of lesions decreases considerably as viewing time becomes less than 4 seconds; and (d) differences in detectability are exaggerated by short viewing times.

The advantages of imaging the chest with digital storage phosphor radiography (SR) may be nullified by its spatial resolution, which is lower than that of conventional film radiography (FR). To test the reader detection performance with the two modalities under clinical conditions, the authors compared 140-kVp isoexposure SR (system resolution: 0.2 mm, 10 bits) and FR images of a variety of chest abnormalities proved by computed tomography (CT) (157 patients, 244 abnormalities, 5,652 observations, six readers). In all tests, SR was as good as or better than FR (P less than .05). In overall detection, indicated by the average area of receiver operating characteristics, SR and FR were equivalent. SR was superior for mediastinal lesions and for pulmonary opacities greater than 2 cm in diameter. For all other types of pulmonary lesions and pleural abnormalities, SR and FR were equivalent. Currently available commercial SR systems can replace film radiographic systems in the detection of a wide variety of chest lesions. SR is likely to enable better visualization than FR in the detection of mediastinal and large pulmonary abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE.Image data compression is an enabling tech-

The ability to resolve the fine linear structures of interstitial lung disease is one measure of the limiting performance characteristics of an imaging system. Conventional screen-film radiography was compared with six algorithms of isodose storage phosphor digital radiography (0.2-mm x 10-bit pixel matrix) in the detection of interstitial lung abnormality documented by means of computed tomography in 40 patients with abnormalities and 25 healthy control subjects. Performance was evaluated with an analysis of variance (the Fisher paired comparison test; P less than .05) of the average receiver operating characteristic area of 2,730 observations by six readers. The moderately and the more markedly high-frequency edge-enhanced algorithms of storage phosphor digital radiographs were equivalent in performance to screen-film radiography. The default mode, low- and medium-frequency edge-enhanced algorithms, and gray scale reversed mode of storage phosphor digital radiography were inferior to screen-film radiography. The authors conclude that high-frequency edge-enhanced algorithms can perform as well as screen-film radiography in the detection of interstitial disease.