Background: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can induce acute respiratory distress, which is characterized by tachypnea, hypoxia, and dyspnea. Intubation and mechanical ventilation are strategic treatments for COVID-19 distress or hypoxia. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify relevant randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series published from April 1, 2021. Results: 24 studies were included in this review. Studies had been conducted in the USA, China, Spain, South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Brazil. Most patients had been intubated in the intensive care unit. Rapid sequence induction had been mostly used for intubation. ROX index can be utilized as the predictor of the necessity of intubation in COVID-19 patients. According to the studies, the rate of intubation was 5 to 88%. It was revealed that 1.4 - 44.5% of patients might be extubated. Yet obesity and age (elderly) are the only risk factors of delayed or difficult extubation. Discussion and Conclusions: Acute respiratory distress in COVID-19 patients could require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Severe respiratory distress, loss of consciousness, and hypoxia had been the most important reasons for intubation. Also, increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, d-dimer, and lipase in combination with hypoxia are correlated with intubation. Old age, diabetes mellitus, respiratory rate, increased level of CRP, bicarbonate level, and oxygen saturation are the most valuable predictors of the need for mechanical ventilation. ICU admission mortality following intubation was found to be 15 to 36%. Awake-prone positioning in comparison with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy did not reduce the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation. There was no association between intubation timing and mortality of the infected patients. Noninvasive ventilation may have survival benefits.
Background: In December 2019, a new pathogen, HCoV, or New Corona Virus 2019 (2019-nCoV), was recognized in Wuhan, China, causing a pandemic. COVID-19 has a wide range of clinical severity. Approximately 3.2% of patients within some periods of the disease require intubation and invasive ventilation. Methods: This study was descriptive-analytical and was conducted in the Imam Khomeini Hospital. Patients with Covid-19 who required endotracheal intubation were identified and their clinical signs and laboratory parameters were recorded. SPSS23 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: 120 patients with coronavirus with different conditions were evaluated. The mean age was 55±14. 30 patients had cardiovascular disease (hypertension) and 20 endocrine disease(diabetes). Respiratory acidosis, decreased oxygen saturation, lymphopenia, and increased CRP were the most common finding before intubation. 31 patients had no comorbidity conditions. However, 27 patients had more than one comorbidity condition, and 23 experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome. The mortality rate was 49.2%. Discussion: Although all laboratory parameters and patients symptoms can affect the treatment outcome, it was found that WBC and absolute lymphocyte count, BUN, SOFA and APACHE scores, inflammatory index ratio CRP / LDH % CRP / ESR% and ESR / LDH%, arterial blood gas indices, pulse rate, and patient temperature before intubation are among the parameters that can affect the patient's 14-day prognosis. Conclusion: Except for the mentioned items, CRP / LDH% ratio seems to be a good indicator for checking the prognosis of discharge or death of patients within 14 days, However, CRP / ESR% and ESR / LDH% are appropriate criteria for determining the prognosis for discharge or stay in the ICU for more than 14 days.
Background. Malnutrition in COVID-19 critically ill patients can lead to poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the association between nutritional status (or risk) and the prognosis of critically ill COVID-19 patients. In this study, prognosis is the primary outcome of “hospital mortality” patients. The second outcome is defined as “need for mechanical ventilation.” Methods and Materials. In this single-center prospective cohort study, 110 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex (Tehran, Iran) between April and September 2021 were enrolled. Participants formed a consecutive sample. MNA-SF, NRS-2002, mNUTRIC, and PNI scores were used to evaluate nutritional assessment. Patients’ lab results and pulse oximetric saturation SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio at the time of intensive care unit (ICU) admission were collected. Patients were screened for nutritional status and categorized into two groups, patients at nutritional risk and nonrisk. Results. Sixty-five (59.1%) of all patients were men. The overall range of age was 52 ± 15. Thirty-six (32.7%) of patients were obese (BMI ≥ 30). The hospital mortality rate was 59.1% (n = 65). According to the different criteria, malnutrition rate was 67.3% (n = 74) (NRS), 28.2% (n = 31) (MNA), 34.5% (n = 38) (mNUTRIC), and 58.2% (n = 64) (PNI). There was a statistically significant association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mNUTRIC risk (OR = 13.5, 95% CI (1.89–16.05), P = 0.002 ), diabetes mellitus (DM) and MNA risk (OR = 2.82, 95% CI (1.01–7.83), P = 0.041 ), hypertension (HTN) and MNA risk (OR = 5.63, 95% CI (2.26–14.05), P < 0.001 ), and malignancy and mNUTRIC risk ( P = 0.048 ). The nutritional risk (all tools) significantly increased the odds of in-hospital death and need for mechanical ventilation. The length of stay was not significantly different in malnourished patients. Conclusion. In the critical care setting of COVID-19 patients, malnutrition is prevalent. Malnutrition (nutritional risk) is associated with an increased risk of need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality. Patients with a history of HTN, CKD, DM, and cancer are more likely to be at nutritional risk at the time of ICU admission.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.