No abstract

No abstract

Objectives: (1) To assess the normal range of thickness of the epiglottis by means of ultrasound measurement. (2) To evaluate inter-observer agreement in measuring the thickness of the epiglottis of normal individuals by ultrasound. (3) To assess the association between biological factors and the thickness of the epiglottis. Methods: Fifty adult volunteers working at a local accident and emergency department were recruited. The thickness of the epiglottis was measured by means of ultrasound examination, which was performed twice by two emergency physicians at different time. The study subjects' age, sex, height and body weight were recorded. Results: The mean thickness of the epiglottis was 0.236 cm and the standard deviation was 0.020. Male subjects had thicker epiglottis. Interobserver agreement of the two emergency physicians who performed the ultrasound scan was very good. Multiple regression models showed that sex and height were useful predictors of the thickness of the epiglottis. Conclusions: Bedside ultrasound assessment of the epiglottis is an easy, rapid and reliable method to evaluate its thickness. Further studies are needed to evaluate the thickness of the epiglottis in patients with epiglottitis before it can be put into clinical use.

No abstract

Objective:To study the impact of patient education video in improving patient satisfaction in the accident and emergency department (AED). Methods: This was a descriptive questionnaire study. A 20-minute patient education video in Cantonese was produced. The video was shown in the waiting hall from 9 am to 5 pm during the weekdays of a week in January 2008. All category 4 (semi-urgent) and category 5 (non-urgent) patients were invited to fill in an evaluation questionnaire after watching the video. The demographics of the patients were collected. There were two parts in the questionnaire. Part 1 contained four questions to test patients' knowledge retention after watching the video. These included questions on pharmacy location, triage system, use of patient identification slip and scope of the AED service. Part 2 contained six evaluation items (based on the 5-point Likert scale) to assess patients' opinion on the education video, understanding of the AED workflow and level of satisfaction after watching. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the knowledge retention scores and the Likert responses between different age and education level subgroups. Results: Altogether 177 questionnaires were returned; 72 were excluded due to incomplete answers or absent patient gum label; and 105 completed questionnaires were analysed. Of the latter, 83 (79%) respondents scored 75% or more in the questions on knowledge retention, 79 (75%) respondents agreed that they understood the workflow of the AED better, 63 (60%) respondents thought that the video covered most frequently asked questions, and 69 (66%) respondents agreed that their level of satisfaction had improved after watching the video. There was no statistically significant difference on comparing the knowledge retention scores between different age and education level subgroups. Respondents more than 60 years old stated a better understanding about the location of consultation rooms after watching the video. Conclusion: A patient education video is useful in providing information about operation and improving patient satisfaction in the accident and emergency department. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2009;16:5-13)