Objective: 1) To study the current use of abdominal X-rays (AXR) in our emergency department (ED). 2) To evaluate the clinical predictors for positive AXR findings. Methods: During the 40 days study period, all patients who had taken abdominal X-rays were included. The attending doctor filled in a questionnaire on demographic data, clinical features and outcome. The three radiologists who participated in this study reported the films and consultant emergency physicians then commented on the appropriateness of the request. The clinical features, which were predictive of positive radiological findings, were sorted out using univariate analysis. Results: 64 patients were included in the 40 days study period. The rate for AXR request was 3.4 per 1000 patients. The most common presenting complaints were abdominal pain (85.9%) and constipation (45.3%). The most frequent clinical findings were abdominal distension (35.9%) and hyperactive bowel sound (31.3%). Only two of the clinical features, including vomiting and rebound tenderness, were found to have significant correlation with positive X-ray findings. Most of the AXR requests and interpretations by ED doctors were considered to be appropriate.

Objective:To study the impact of patient education video in improving patient satisfaction in the accident and emergency department (AED). Methods: This was a descriptive questionnaire study. A 20-minute patient education video in Cantonese was produced. The video was shown in the waiting hall from 9 am to 5 pm during the weekdays of a week in January 2008. All category 4 (semi-urgent) and category 5 (non-urgent) patients were invited to fill in an evaluation questionnaire after watching the video. The demographics of the patients were collected. There were two parts in the questionnaire. Part 1 contained four questions to test patients' knowledge retention after watching the video. These included questions on pharmacy location, triage system, use of patient identification slip and scope of the AED service. Part 2 contained six evaluation items (based on the 5-point Likert scale) to assess patients' opinion on the education video, understanding of the AED workflow and level of satisfaction after watching. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the knowledge retention scores and the Likert responses between different age and education level subgroups. Results: Altogether 177 questionnaires were returned; 72 were excluded due to incomplete answers or absent patient gum label; and 105 completed questionnaires were analysed. Of the latter, 83 (79%) respondents scored 75% or more in the questions on knowledge retention, 79 (75%) respondents agreed that they understood the workflow of the AED better, 63 (60%) respondents thought that the video covered most frequently asked questions, and 69 (66%) respondents agreed that their level of satisfaction had improved after watching the video. There was no statistically significant difference on comparing the knowledge retention scores between different age and education level subgroups. Respondents more than 60 years old stated a better understanding about the location of consultation rooms after watching the video. Conclusion: A patient education video is useful in providing information about operation and improving patient satisfaction in the accident and emergency department. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2009;16:5-13)

Background: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is negligible in early gastric cancer (EGC) within expanded criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, regional lymph nodes in abdominal CT scans are sometimes enlarged in patients with EGC within the expanded criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of regional lymph node enlargement on abdominal CT scan in patients with EGC within the expanded criteria for ESD. Methods: From December 2010 to April 2015, among 301 patients with EGC within the ESD expanded criteria, 47 patients with regional lymph node enlargement shown by abdominal CT scan were prospectively enrolled. We performed surgical resection or periodic follow-up with abdominal CT scans and upper endoscopy every 6 months to evaluate whether the enlarged lymph nodes are due to metastasis or a reactive change. Results: The mean age of the 47 patients (38 males, 9 female) was 64.8 years. The enlarged lymph nodes were usually single (26/47, 44.6%) and sized as follows: 11 nodes were ≤ 5 mm, 19 were 6-10 mm, and 17 were ≥ 10 mm. Four of the 47 patients initially underwent surgical resection, and 8 patients underwent surgical resection after ESD. However, there was no lymph node metastasis in surgical specimens. Thirty-five patients received ESD and periodically followed up at a median duration of 56 months (IQR: 44-59 month). The enlarged lymph node disappeared in 12 of 35 patients, decreased in 9 patients and remained the same size in 13 patients, and increased in 1 patient. Conclusion: Regional lymph node enlargement on abdominal CT scan in patients within expanded criteria for ESD of ECG may be not due to metastasis but a reactive change.

No abstract