BackgroundLate onset depression (LOD) may precede the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We aimed to determine the rate of clinical and imaging features associated with prodromal PD/DLB in patients with LOD.MethodsIn a cross-sectional design, 36 patients with first onset of a depressive disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria) diagnosed after the age of 55 (LOD group) and 30 healthy controls (HC) underwent a detailed clinical assessment. In addition, 28/36 patients with LOD and 20/30 HC underwent a head MRI and 29/36 and 25/30, respectively, had dopamine transporter imaging by 123I-ioflupane single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Image analysis of both scans was performed by a rater blind to the participant group. Results of clinical assessments and imaging results were compared between the two groups.ResultsPatients with LOD (n=36) had significantly worse scores than HC (n=30) on the PD screening questionnaire (mean (SD) 1.8 (1.9) vs 0.8 (1.2); p=0.01), Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale total (mean (SD) 19.2 (12.7) vs 6.1 (5.7); p<0.001), REM-sleep behaviour disorder screening questionnaire (mean (SD) 4.3 (3.2) vs 2.1 (2.1); p=0.001), Lille Apathy Rating Scale (mean (SD) −23.3 (9.6) vs −27.0 (4.7); p=0.04) and the Scales for Outcomes in PD-Autonomic (mean (SD) 14.9 (8.7) vs 7.7 (4.9); p<0.001). Twenty-four per cent of patients with LOD versus 4% HC had an abnormal 123I-ioflupane SPECT scan (p=0.04).ConclusionsLOD is associated with increased rates of motor and non-motor features of PD/DLB and of abnormal 123I-ioflupane SPECTs. These results suggest that patients with LOD should be considered at increased risk of PD/DLB.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Fifteen percent of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will progress to dementia within 2 years. There is increasing focus on the evaluation of biomarkers which point towards the underlying pathology. This enables better prediction of clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of the dementia subtype is crucial for appropriate management and accurate prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare MRI measures in stable mild cognitive impairment patients (stable-MCI), prodromal Alzheimer’s disease (pro-AD), and prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies (pro-DLB). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Out of 1,814 patients assessed in Essex memory clinic between 2002 and 2017, 424 had MCI at baseline with follow-up data. All patients underwent comprehensive clinical and cognitive assessment at each assessment. MRI scans were acquired at patients’ baseline assessment, corresponding to the time of initial MCI clinical diagnosis. Patients were grouped according to their diagnosis at the end of follow-up. All baseline scans were visually rated according to established rating scales for medial temporal atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy (GCA), and white matter lesions (WMLs). <b><i>Results:</i></b> MRI scans were available for 28 pro-DLB patients and were matched against 27 pro-AD and 28 stable-MCI patients for age, sex, and education. The mean follow-up duration was 34 months for the pro-AD group, 27 months for the pro-DLB group, and 21 months for the stable-MCI group. MTA scores were significantly greater in pro-AD patients compared to pro-DLB (<i>p</i> = 0.047) and stable-MCI patients (<i>p</i> = 0.012). There was no difference on GCA or WMLs between pro-AD, pro-DLB, and stable-MCI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study indicates that a simple visual rating of MTA at the stage of MCI already differs at a group level between patients that progress to AD, DLB, or continue to be stable-MCI. This could aid clinicians to differentiate between MCI patients who are likely to develop AD, versus those who might progress to DLB or remain stable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.