LADG was associated with less wound pain during long-term follow-up after surgery, whereas symptoms related to overeating were common. Based on our findings and the patients' reported satisfaction, we recommend LADG for cT1 gastric cancer as an effective procedure with excellent long-term survival.
In Japan, planned interventions may improve surgical gastric cancer mortality, but an unexpected trend of persistent existence of intestinal type cancer suggests the need for more robust medical intervention.
Background S-1 is an oral anticancer drug widely used in postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients in Japan with stage II/III gastric cancer. Candidates for more intense adjuvant treatments need to be identified, particularly among patients with stage III cancer. Methods Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who underwent surgery and received S-1 postoperatively between 2000 and 2010.Results Factors indicating poor prognosis identified by univariate analysis include male sex (P = 0.022), age C67 years (P = 0.021), intestinal-type histology (P = 0.049), lymph node ratio C16.7 % (P \ 0.0001), open surgery (P = 0.039), as well as the 13th JGCA stage (P \ 0.0001) and the 14th JGCA/7th International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage (P \ 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node ratio C16.7 % and intestinal-type histology were significant as predictors of prognosis, independent from the pathological stages. Based on these and other findings, stage IIIC cancer on the 14th JGCA/7th UICC stage system in combination with the lymph node ratio could identify patients with extremely high risk for recurrence Conclusions Our current findings suggest that lymph node ratio C16.7 % in combination with the new staging system could be a useful prognostic indicator in advanced gastric cancer. Because these high-risk patients cannot be identified preoperatively by any diagnostic tool, further improvement in postoperative adjuvant therapy is warranted.
Background Little is known about risk factors for recurrence in stage IB gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis. The aims of this study were to determine prognostic factors associated with long-term survival and to clarify patterns of recurrence. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 130 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at Kitasato University East Hospital from 2001 through 2010 and analyzed clinicopathological characteristics associated with survival and patterns of recurrence. Results Of the 130 patients, 12 (9.2 %) had recurrence, among whom 10 (83 %) patients died. Four patients (3.1 %) died of other diseases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 89 %. Of the 12 patients with recurrence, 7 (58 %) had liver metastasis, 3 (25 %) had distant lymph-node metastasis, 2 (17 %) had peritoneal dissemination, and 1 (8.3 %) had locoregional recurrence. Patients with tumors more than 5 cm in diameter tended to have recurrence within 1 year. Patients who had recurrence more than 2 years after surgery tended to survive for longer than 5 years after recurrence. Moderate or marked venous invasion (v2 or v3) and age [65 years were significantly associated with relapse-free and overall survival on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the only independent prognostic factor for relapse-free and overall survival was venous invasion. Conclusions Moderate or marked venous invasion (v2 or v3) is an independent predictor of relapse-free and overall survival in stage IB node-negative gastric cancer. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, currently not given to this subgroup of patients, may improve the outcomes of patients with stage IB node-negative gastric cancer, particularly when accompanied by venous invasion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.