Background: While intussusception is relatively common in children, it is rare in adults. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients older than 18 years with the diagnosis of intussusception between 1981 and 2001. Results: Eleven patients with surgically or endoscopically proven intussusception were encountered at the University-affiliated emergency center. The patients ranged in age from 19 to 88 years with a mean age of 45 years. Males predominated by a ratio of 7:4. Most patients (82%) presented with symptoms of bowel obstruction. The mean duration of symptoms was 4.5 days with a range of 4 h to 25 days. Correct pre-treatment diagnosis was made in 82% of the patients using abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT). The causes of intussusception were organic lesions in 64% of the patients, postoperative in 18% and idiopathic in 18%, respectively. 73% of patients had emergency operations, and an attempt at nonoperative reduction was performed and completed successfully in 3 patients with ileo-colic or colonic type of intussusception. There have been no cases of morbidity or mortality in our series and no recurrence has occurred up to the present time. Conclusions: Abdominal ultrasonography and CT were effective tools for the diagnosis of intussusception. Patients with ileo-colic and colonic intussusception without malignant lesions could be good candidates for nonoperative reduction prior to definitive surgery.

Pneumoperitoneum (PP) is usually the result of perforation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with associated peritonitis. However, other rare causes, including spontaneous PP incidental to intrathoracic, intra-abdominal, gynecologic, and miscellaneous other origins not associated with a perforated GI tract have been described in the literature. Six cases of PP without any perforated GI tract are reported. Three patients with generalized peritonitis underwent exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy when clinical examinations suggested an acute abdomen. At surgical procedure, perforated pyometra, perforated liver abscess and a ruptured necrotic lesion of a liver metastasis were documented in these patients, respectively. We also saw 3 PP patients not associated with peritonitis. Two patients with PP caused by pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis were encountered, 1 was managed conservatively and the other received diagnostic laparoscopy. A patient in whom pneumomediastinum and pneumoretroperitoneum were accompanied by PP caused by an alveolar rupture based on decreased pulmonary compliance due to malnutrition was managed conservatively. The history of the patient and knowledge of the less frequent causes of PP can possibly contribute towards refraining from exploratory laparotomy in the absence of peritonitis.

Laparoscopic intervention offers better results in the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma and isolated bowel rupture.

The diagnosis and treatment of internal abdominal hernia usually require laparotomy. We report a case of preoperative diagnosis and laparoscopic repair of paracecal hernia. A 90-year-old woman was referred with features of a well-established small bowel obstruction (SBO). Computed tomography and a small bowel contrast examination showed a paracecal hernia. With the patient under general anesthesia, laparoscopic surgery was carried out with the use of pneumoperitoneum, and an easy reduction of the incarcerated intestinal loop was achieved by gentle traction of the intestine. The bowel was assessed for viability and showed no evidence of nonviability. The abnormal orifice in the paracecal region was observed. The orifice was closed with 3-0 PDS II (polydiaxonone) sutures laparoscopically. A laparotomy was avoided, and the patient recovered without significant complications. We conclude that laparoscopy can play a useful role in the treatment of internal hernia causing SBO when an obstructive lesion has been detected and decompression accomplished preoperatively.

Electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution is acidic water that contains active oxygen and active chlorine and possesses a redox potential. We performed peritoneal and abscess lavages with an electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution to treat 7 patients with peritonitis and intraperitoneal abscesses, who were seen in our department between December 1994 and April 1995. The underlying disease was duodenal ulcer perforation in 4 of these 7 patients and gastric ulcer perforation, acute enteritis, and intraperitoneal perforation of pyometrium in 1 patient each. Irrigation was performed twice a day. Microbiological studies of the paracentesis fluid were negative in 3 cases, and the irrigation period was 2 4 days. Anaerobic bacteria were isolated in 3 of the 4 positive cases (Bucferoides in 2, Prevotellu in l), and a fungus (Cundirlu) was isolated in the remaining patient. The period of irrigation in these patients ranged from 9 to 12 days, but conversion to a microorganism negative state was observed in 3-7 days. Key Words: Electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution-Peritoneal lavageLavage of intraperitoneal abscess-Redox potential.Electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution is produced on the anode side by electrolyzing salt-containing water through a diaphragm; it contains active oxygen and active chlorine and a redox potential (1). This electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution is said to create an environment beyond the boundaries of the region in which microorganisms can survive and to have a germicidal effect on all bacteria and fungi as a result of the action of the active oxygen and active chlorine that it contains. It has recently come to be used in a variety of medical settings.It is also being used in our department, for hand washing in the outpatient clinic and on the ward and for disinfecting floors, disinfecting contaminated wounds, and so forth. However in this study, we tried to use it for lavage of foci of contamination within the peritoneal cavity.