Recently, trans-radial intervention has gained popularity as a common procedure to reduce hemorrhagic complications. However, the cuff-type hemostatic device (TR Band) previously used at our institution required 6 h to achieve hemostasis. Since July 2016, we have been using the VasoSTAT, a new hemostatic device that could achieve hemostasis in 4 h. In a verification study, we found that prolonged activated clotting time (ACT) was related to transient hemorrhage occurrence after the hemostatic procedure. Therefore, we designed a hemostatic protocol based on ACT and evaluated its efficacy. In this retrospective and observational study, 78 and 111 patients used the VasoSTAT and TR Band, respectively, from July 2015 to May 2017. In the VasoSTAT group, the ACTs were significantly lower in the hemostasis success (246 ± 46 s) than in the failure group patients (327 ± 59 s) (P < 0.01). Therefore, we applied the hemostatic protocol to 271 patients from May 2017 to March 2020. The hemostasis success rate was 96% in the post-protocol applied group patients, which was significantly higher than the 82% success rate in the pre-protocol applied group patients (P < 0.01). VasoSTAT resulted in adequate hemostasis in 4 h. Further, ACT was predictive of adequate hemostasis.

Background. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a drug-eluting stent (DES) is a common therapeutic option for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, stent-associated complications, such as bleeding associated with dual antiplatelet therapy, in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis, and neoatherosclerosis, remain. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are expected to reduce stent-associated complications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DCB therapy and compare it with that of DES therapy in patients with ACS. Materials and Methods. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we examined all patients with ACS treated with DCB or DES between July 2014 and November 2020. Patients with left main trunk lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) at one year. Results. Three hundred and seventy-two patients were treated with DES, and 83 patients were treated with DCB. MACE occurred in 10 (12.0%) patients in the DCB group and in 50 (13.4%) patients in the DES group ( P = 0.73 ). Conclusions. DCB is a valuable and effective therapy for patients with ACS. Moreover, DCB may become an alternative therapy for DES in patients with ACS.

No abstract

No abstract