Chinese farmers need loans. It’s hard for them to borrow from formal lenders like banks or even the rural credit cooperatives. Thus, to satisfy their financial needs, farmers borrow from informal lenders. While farmers have benefited from the post-Mao reform in many respects, financial reforms of the past three decades have failed to create an effective system in which farmers can borrow from formal lenders. To create an effective and efficient financial system that can meet farmers’ needs, it is necessary for informal lenders to play an active role in rural finance. China’s rural finances face four key problems: asymmetric information, a lack of collateral, the unique structure of costs and risks, and the nonproductive use of loans. Informal lenders have an advantage in solving these problems. This article proposes the creation of a financial system in which informal lenders play an active role in lending to farmers and formal and informal lenders cooperate with each other. It develops the argument based on the first author’s field research in the provinces of Guangdong, Henan, Jilin, Shaanxi, Shandong, and Shanxi.

No abstract

No abstract

When a central government deals with local demands, it may strengthen political accountability of the local governments by political decentralization or offer benefits through economic assistance. An authoritarian regime uses economic assistance policy because political decentralization may contradict regime survival. Although economic benefits can be used to buy political support, the distribution of these benefits is seldom equal. We argue that the unequal distribution is more salient in regions where ethnic minorities reside because the unusual demographic composition of those areas make it difficult for the national government to evaluate the performance of the local government who is responsible for the distribution of the economic benefits. As a result, economic assistance may backfire in ethnic regions and intensify their existing conflicts. We develop a simple formal model to illustrate our arguments and explore the cases of Xinjiang and Hong Kong for empirical analysis.

No abstract