The aim of this study was to examine the expression of Lin28A and androgen receptor (AR) in ER-/Her2+ breast cancer, and to research the association of Lin28A and AR co-expression status with patients' prognosis. The expression of Lin28A and AR in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded surgical sections from 305 patients with ER-/Her2+ breast cancer was analyzed by immunohistochemistry, and the co-expression patterns in breast cancer cells were investigated by immunofluorescent staining. The impact of the expression of Lin28A and AR in prognosis was also assessed by the Kaplan-Meier, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression models. This study included 305 cases ER-/Her2+ breast cancer patients. Lin28A and AR were expressed in 240 cases (78.7 %) and 220 cases (72.1 %), respectively. Lin28A tended to be higher in AR-positive patients (75.0 %). Lin28A and AR co-expression (Lin28+/AR+) was significantly associated with high tumor grade (G3) (p = 0.023) and high Ki67 index (p = 0.020). The mRNA and protein expression levels of Lin28A and AR were higher in MDA-MB-453 cells (ER-/Her2+) than in the MDA-MB-231 cells (ER-/Her2-). In univariate analysis, Lin28A+/AR+ was significant risk factors associated with unfavorable OS (p = 0.049) and RFS (p = 0.019). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that Lin28A+/AR+ expression showed lower RFS rates compared with Lin28A-/AR+ (p = 0.043) and Lin28A-/AR- patients(p = 0.019). Multivariate cox model showed that Lin28A+/AR+ remained an independent negative prognostic factor for RFS. Our study showed that Lin28A and AR co-expressed in ER-/Her-2+ breast cancer and correlated with poor prognosis. The possibility that Lin28A may drive AR expression via a positive feedback mechanism remains to be tested.
Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has been the commonest renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although the disease classification, diagnosis and targeted therapy of RCC has been increasingly evolving attributing to the rapid development of current molecular pathology, the current clinical treatment situation is still challenging considering the comprehensive and progressively developing nature of malignant cancer. The study is to identify more potential responsible genes during the development of ccRCC using bioinformatic analysis, thus aiding more precise interpretation of the disease Methods Firstly, different cDNA expression profiles from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) online database were used to screen the abnormal differently expressed genes (DEGs) between ccRCC and normal renal tissues. Then, based on the protein–protein interaction network (PPI) of all DEGs, the module analysis was performed to scale down the potential genes, and further survival analysis assisted our proceeding to the next step for selecting a credible key gene. Thirdly, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative real-time PCR (QPCR) were conducted to validate the expression change of the key gene in ccRCC comparing to normal tissues, meanwhile the prognostic value was verified using TCGA clinical data. Lastly, the potential biological function of the gene and signaling mechanism of gene regulating ccRCC development was preliminary explored. Results Four cDNA expression profiles were picked from GEO database based on the number of containing sample cases, and a total of 192 DEGs, including 39 up-regulated and 153 down-regulated genes were shared in four profiles. Based on the DEGs PPI network, four function modules were identified highlighting a FGF1 gene involving PI3K-AKT signaling pathway which was shared in 3/4 modules. Further, both the IHC performed with ccRCC tissue microarray which contained 104 local samples and QPCR conducted using 30 different samples confirmed that FGF1 was aberrant lost in ccRCC. And Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis revealed that FGF1 gene loss was related to worse ccRCC patients survival. Lastly, the pathological clinical features of FGF1 gene and the probable biological functions and signaling pathways it involved were analyzed using TCGA clinical data. Conclusions Using bioinformatic analysis, we revealed that FGF1 expression was aberrant lost in ccRCC which statistical significantly correlated with patients overall survival, and the gene’s clinical features and potential biological functions were also explored. However, more detailed experiments and clinical trials are needed to support its potential drug-target role in clinical medical use.
The aim of this study was to examine the association between molecular subtype (MST) and prognosis and research the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) effect in T1-T2 tumors with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). This retrospective study studied breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors and 1-3 positive ALNs according to MST: Luminal A, Luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her-2) positive, and Triple negative. The impact of adjuvant PMRT in T1-T2 tumors with 1-3 positive ALNs was also assessed. This study included 1369 patients: 33.0 % Luminal A, 42.9 % Luminal B, 11.9 % Her-2 positive, and 12.2 % Triple negative. On univariate and multivariate analyses, MST was associated with locoregional relapse (LRR). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PMRT significantly decreased LRR risk (p = 0.017) and distant metastasis (DM) risk (p < 0.0001). In subgroup analysis, PMRT showed significant benefits of improvement in LRR in patients with younger age, positive lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNs) >25 %. Moreover, the nomogram could more accurately predict LRR (c-index 0.75) in T1-2N1 breast cancer patients. MST associated with patient outcomes in breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors and 1-3 positive ALN. It makes sense to offer PMRT for patients aged<40 years old, LVI, 2 and 3 positive lymph nodes, and ratio of positive LNs >25 %.
Background The chemotherapy-resistance of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a major challenge. The Nek2B kinase and β-catenin serve as crucial regulators of mitotic processes. The aim of this study was to test the correlation between Nek2B and TNBC chemotherapy sensitivity, and to determine the regulation of Nek2B on β-catenin and wnt/β-catenin signal pathway. Methods Gene Expression Omnibus(GEO) databases were used to gather gene exprsssion data of TNBC patients who undergoing chemotherapy. The co-expression of Nek2B and β-catenin in TNBC surgical sections and cells were analysed by immunohistochemistry, Q-RT-PCR, Western-blot and immunofluorescent staining. The impact of the expression of Nek2B and β-catenin in prognosis was also assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curves. CCK8 assay was used to detect the IC50 value of TNBC cell line. The endogenous binding capacity of Nek2B and β-catenin and phosphorylation of β-catenin by Nek2B were detected using co-immunoprecipitation (CO-IP). Chromatin immune-precipitation (ChIP) analysis and Luciferase Assays were used to evaluate the binding ability of the Nek2B, β-catenin and TCF4 complex with LEF-1 promoter. Nek2B-siRNA and Nek2B plasmid were injected into nude mice, and tumorigenesis was monitored. Results We found that overexpression of Nek2B and β-catenin in TNBC samples, was associated with patients poor prognosis. Patients with positive Nek2B expression were less sensitive to paclitaxel-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Interestingly, in a panel of established TNBC cell line, Nek2B and β-catenin were highly expressed in cells exhibiting paclitaxel resistance. Our data also suggest that β-catenin binded to and was phosphorylated by Nek2B, and was in a complex with TCF4. Nek2B mainly regulates the expression of β-catenin in TNBC nucleus. Nek2B, β-catenin and TCF4 can be binded with the WRE functional area of LEF-1 promoter. Nek2B can activite wnt signaling pathway and wnt downstream target genes. The tumors treated by Nek2B siRNA associated with paclitaxel were the smallest in nude mouse, and Nek2B can regulate the expression of β-catenin and wnt downstream target genes in vivo. Conclusion Our study suggested that Nek2B can bind to β-catenin and the co-expression correlated with TNBC patients poor prognosis. It appears that Nek2B and β-catenin might synergize to promote chemotherapy resistance.
Background Pancreatic cancer has been a threateningly lethal malignant tumor worldwide. Despite the promising survival improvement in other cancer types attributing to the fast development of molecular precise medicine, the current treatment situation of pancreatic cancer is still woefully challenging since its limited response to neither traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy nor emerging immunotherapy. The study is to explore potential responsible genes during the development of pancreatic cancer, thus identifying promising gene indicators and probable drug targets. Methods Different bioinformatic analysis were used to interpret the genetic events in pancreatic cancer development. Firstly, based on multiple cDNA microarray profiles from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, the genes with differently mRNA expression in cancer comparing to normal pancreatic tissues were identified, followed by being grouped based on the difference level. Then, GO and KEGG were performed to separately interpret the multiple groups of genes, and further Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox Regression analysis assisted us to scale down the candidate genes and select the potential key genes. Further, the basic physicochemical properties, the association with immune cells infiltration, mutation or other types variations besides expression gap in pancreatic cancer comparing to normal tissues of the selected key genes were analyzed. Moreover, the aberrant changed expression of key genes was validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) experiment using local hospital tissue microarray samples and the clinical significance was explored based on TCGA clinical data. Results Firstly, a total of 22,491 genes were identified to express differently in cancer comparing to normal pancreatic tissues based on 5 cDNA expression profiles, and the difference of 487/22491 genes was over eightfold, and 55/487 genes were shared in multi profiles. Moreover, after genes interpretation which showed the > eightfold genes were mainly related to extracellular matrix structural constituent regulation, Kaplan–Meier survival and Cox-regression analysis were performed continually, and the result indicated that of the 55 extracellular locating genes, GPRC5A and IMUP were the only two independent prognostic indicators of pancreatic cancer. Further, detailed information of IMUP and GPRC5A were analyzed including their physicochemical properties, their expression and variation ratio and their association with immune cells infiltration in cancer, as well as the probable signaling pathways of genes regulation on pancreatic cancer development. Lastly, local IHC experiment performed on PAAD tissue array which was produced with 62 local hospital patients samples confirmed that GPRC5A and IMUP were abnormally up-regulated in pancreatic cancer, which directly associated with worse patients both overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). Conclusions Using multiple bioinformatic analysis as well as local hospital samples validation, we revealed that GPRC5A and IMUP expression were abnormally up-regulated in pancreatic cancer which associated statistical significantly with patients survival, and the genes’ biological features and clinical significance were also explored. However, more detailed experiments and clinical trials are obligatory to support their further potential drug-target role in clinical medical treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.