Five Sib antitoxin RNAs, members of a family of cis-encoded small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) in Escherichia coli, repress their target mRNAs, which encode Ibs toxins. This target repression occurs only between cognate sRNA–mRNA pairs with an exception of ibsA. We performed co-transformation assays to assess the ability of SibC derivatives to repress ibsC expression, thereby revealing the regions of SibC that are essential for ibsC mRNA recognition. SibC has two target recognition domains, TRD1 and TRD2, which function independently. The target site for TRD1 is located within the ORF of ibsC, whereas the target site for TRD2 is located in the translational initiation region. The TRD1 sequence is sufficient to repress ibsC expression. In contrast, TRD2 requires a specific structure in addition to the recognition sequence. An in vitro structural probing analysis showed that the initial interactions at these two recognition sites allowed base-pairing to progress into the flanking sequences. Displacement of the TRD1 and TRD2 domains of SibC by the corresponding domains of SibD changed the target specificity of SibC from ibsC to ibsD, suggesting that these two elements modulate the cognate target recognition of each Sib RNA by discriminating among non-cognate ibs mRNAs.
Csr is a conserved global regulatory system that represses or activates gene expression posttranscriptionally. CsrA of Escherichia coli is a homodimeric RNA binding protein that regulates transcription elongation, translation initiation, and mRNA stability by binding to the 5= untranslated leader or initial coding sequence of target transcripts. pnp mRNA, encoding the 3= to 5= exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), was previously identified as a CsrA target by transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq). Previous studies also showed that RNase III and PNPase participate in a pnp autoregulatory mechanism in which RNase III cleavage of the untranslated leader, followed by PNPase degradation of the resulting 5= fragment, leads to pnp repression by an undefined translational repression mechanism. Here we demonstrate that CsrA binds to two sites in pnp leader RNA but only after the transcript is fully processed by RNase III and PNPase. In the absence of processing, both of the binding sites are sequestered in an RNA secondary structure, which prevents CsrA binding. The CsrA dimer bridges the upstream high-affinity site to the downstream site that overlaps the pnp Shine-Dalgarno sequence such that bound CsrA causes strong repression of pnp translation. CsrA-mediated translational repression also leads to a small increase in the pnp mRNA decay rate. Although CsrA has been shown to regulate translation and mRNA stability of numerous genes in a variety of organisms, this is the first example in which prior mRNA processing is required for CsrA-mediated regulation. IMPORTANCECsrA protein represses translation of numerous mRNA targets, typically by binding to multiple sites in the untranslated leader region preceding the coding sequence. We found that CsrA represses translation of pnp by binding to two sites in the pnp leader transcript but only after it is processed by RNase III and PNPase. Processing by these two ribonucleases alters the mRNA secondary structure such that it becomes accessible to the ribosome for translation as well as to CsrA. As one of the CsrA binding sites overlaps the pnp ribosome binding site, bound CsrA prevents ribosome binding. This is the first example in which regulation by CsrA requires prior mRNA processing and should link pnp expression to conditions affecting CsrA activity.
Elucidation of the folded structures that RNA forms in vivo is vital to understanding its functions. Chemical reagents that modify the Watson-Crick (WC) face of unprotected nucleobases are particularly useful in structure elucidation. Dimethyl sulfate penetrates cell membranes and informs on RNA base-pairing and secondary structure but only modifies the WC face of adenines and cytosines. We present glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and phenylglyoxal as potent in vivo reagents that target the WC face of guanines as well as cytosines and adenines. Tests on rice ( 5.8S rRNA in vitro read out by reverse transcription and gel electrophoresis demonstrate specific modification of almost all guanines in a time- and pH-dependent manner. Subsequent in vivo tests on rice, a eukaryote, and and, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, showed that all three reagents enter living cells without prior membrane permeabilization or pH adjustment of the surrounding media and specifically modify solvent-exposed guanine, cytosine, and adenine residues.
Most small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) are known to base pair with target mRNAs and regulate mRNA stability or translation to trigger various changes in the cell metabolism of Escherichia coli. The SdsR sRNA is expressed specifically during the stationary phase and represses tolC and mutS expression. However, it was not previously known whether the growth-phase-dependent regulation of SdsR is important for cell growth. Here, we ectopically expressed SdsR during the exponential phase and examined cell growth and survival. We found that ectopic expression of SdsR led to a significant and Hfq-dependent cell death with accompanying cell filamentation. This SdsR-driven cell death was alleviated by overexpression of RyeA, an sRNA transcribed on the opposite DNA strand, suggesting that SdsR/RyeA is a novel type of toxin-antitoxin (T/A) system in which both the toxin and the antitoxin are sRNAs. We defined the minimal region required for the SdsR-driven cell death. We also performed RNA-seq analysis and identified 209 genes whose expression levels were altered by more than twofold following pulse expression of ectopic SdsR at exponential phase. Finally, we found that that the observed SdsR-driven cell death was mainly caused by the SdsR-mediated repression of yhcB, which encodes an inner membrane protein.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.