Continuous processing for the production of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) gains more and more importance. Several solutions exist for all the necessary production steps, leading to the possibility to build fully continuous processes. Low pH viral inactivation is a part of the standard platform process for mAb production. Consequently, Klutz et al. introduced the coiled flow inverter (CFI) as a tool for continuous low pH viral inactivation. Besides theoretical calculations of viral reduction, no viral clearance study has been presented so far. In addition, the validation of continuous viral clearance is often neglected in the already existing studies for continuous processing. This study shows in detail the development and execution of a virus study for continuous low pH viral inactivation inside a CFI. The concept presented is also valid for adaptation to other continuous viral clearance steps. The development of this concept includes the technical rationale for an experimental setup, a valid spiking procedure, and finally a sampling method. The experimental results shown represent a viral study using xenotropic murine leukemia virus as a model virus. Two different protein A (ProtA) chromatography setups with varying pH levels were tested. In addition, one of these setups was tested against a batch experiment utilizing the same process material. The results show that sufficient low pH viral inactivation (decadic logarithm reduction value >4) was achieved in all experiments. Complete viral inactivation took place within the first 14.5 min for both continuous studies and the batch study, hence showing similar results. This study therefore represents a successful virus study concept and experiment for a continuous viral inactivation step. Moreover, it was shown that the transfer from batch results to the continuous process is possible. This is accomplished by the narrow residence time distribution of the CFI, showing how close the setup approaches the ideal plug flow and with that batch operation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2019;116:857-869. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/bit Symbols: d, decadic logarithm of the serial dilution steps; D, sample predilution; n, total number of analyzed cell culture wells; n p , number of virus-positive wells; p, probability value; P i , summation of virus-positive cell cultures within the virus transition area; R w , relative width; v, decadic logarithm of the volume conversion factor; V, overall volume of the virus-containing sample; V w , analyzed sample volume; Y 0 , decadic logarithm of the highest dilution of the virus-containing sample; Θ 0.005 , dimensionless time point where 0.5% of the maximum dimensionless concentration is reached; Θ 0.995 , dimensionless time point where 99.5% of the maximum dimensionless concentration is reached. K E Y W O R D S coiled flow inverter, continuous processing, low pH, monoclonal antibodies, viral inactivation

The aim of this study was to analyze the role of humoral immunity in early human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. As neutralizing activities in HIV-positive sera are rarely detectable earlier than 9 to 12 months after infection using primary lymphocytes as target cells in neutralization assays, humoral immunity is generally thought not to contribute significantly to early virus control in the patients. Besides lymphocytes, cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage are known to be important target cells for HIV in vivo during the establishment of the infection. Therefore, we studied the neutralization of early primary HIV isolates by autologous serum samples using primary macrophages as target cells in the neutralization assays. We analyzed neutralizing activities against the autologous HIV-1 isolates in 10 patients' sera taken shortly after seroconversion, both on primary macrophages and, for comparison, on lymphocytes. Viruses were isolated and expanded in primary mixed cultures containing macrophages and lymphocytes in order to avoid selection for one particular cell type. All viruses replicated to different degrees in macrophages and lymphocytes; nine had a nonsyncytiuminducing phenotype, and one was syncytium inducing. The detection of neutralizing antibodies in acute primary HIV infection depended on the target cells used. Confirming previous studies, we did not find neutralizing activities on lymphocytes at this early time point. In contrast, neutralizing activities were detectable in the same sera if primary macrophages were used as target cells. Differences in neutralizing activities on macrophages and lymphocytes were not due to different virus variants being present in the different cell systems, as gp120 sequences derived from both cell types were homogeneous. Neutralization activities on macrophages did not correlate with the amount of ␤-chemokines in the sera. As affinity-purified immunoglobulin G preparations from an early patient serum also exhibited neutralization of the autologous virus isolate on primary macrophages, but not on lymphocytes, neutralization is very likely due to antibodies against viral epitopes necessary for infection of macrophages but not for infection of lymphocytes. Our data suggest that, along with cellmediated immunity, humoral immunity may contribute to the reduction of primary viremia in the patient. This was further supported by a certain association between neutralizing antibody titers on macrophages and viral load in the patients.

V3 serotyping refers to a system based on binding of antibody in patient sera to V3-loop peptides derived from HIV-1 env genetic subtypes. The V3x serotype represents reactivity of serum from an HIV-1-infected patient (regardless of viral genetic subtype), which reacts preferentially to a V3 peptide derived from the X subtype sequence. We have classified HIV-1 serotypes, determined the relationship between the HIV-1 V3 serotypes and viral genetic subtypes in a large study (n = 125), and evaluated the performance of three different V3 peptide-binding assays. Seven HIV-1 V3 serotypes were identified: A, B, B-Br, B-Th, C, D, and E. Serotypes B-Br and B-Th represent sera that react specifically to peptides derived from Brazilian B (B-Br, GWGR) and Thai B (B-Th, GPGQ) strains. The HIV-1 V3 B, C, and E serotypes correlated closely with their viral env genetic subtypes; 19-26 of 32 B sera (59-79%), 3-4 of 4 C sera (75-100%), and 19-22 of 23 E sera (83-96%) were identified as serotypes B, C, and E, respectively. In contrast, two major V3 serotypes were classified in A sera: A (14-18 of 36 [40-50%]) and C (12-19 of 36 [33-54%]). Similarly, two major V3 serotypes were classified in D sera: B (6-10 of 20 [30-50%]) and D (9-12 of 20 [45-60%]). Serotyping of subtype E sera showed the best concordance with genetic subtypes by all assays. Overall, HIV-1 V3 serotyping produced consistent results among three laboratories. However, HIV-1 V3 serotypes do not distinguish all HIV-1 genetic subtypes. The relative biological significance of the V3 serotypes remains to be elucidated.

No abstract

No abstract