This study demonstrates that gemcitabine is more effective than 5-FU in alleviation of some disease-related symptoms in patients with advanced, symptomatic pancreas cancer. Gemcitabine also confers a modest survival advantage over treatment with 5-FU.

Summary Background Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have limited treatment options after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. This multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial evaluated atezolizumab, an engineered humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1), in this population. Methods Three hundred and ten patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg, every 3 weeks). PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) was prospectively assessed by immunohistochemistry. The co-primary endpoints were the objective response rate by RECIST v1.1 and immune modified RECIST. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to test whether the objective response rate was significantly higher than the historical control of 10% at alpha level of 0·05. Exploratory analyses included assessing the association between The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular subtypes, CD8+ T cell infiltration, mutation load, and clinical outcomes. Findings By independent review, objective response rates were 26% (95% CI 18 to 36) in the IC2/3 group, 18% (95% CI 13 to 24) in the IC1/2/3 group and 15% (95% CI 11 to 19) in all patients. With a median follow-up of 11·7 months, ongoing responses were observed in 84% of responders. The median duration of response was not reached (range 2·0*, 13·7* months, *censored). The median overall survival was 11·4 months (95% CI 9·0 to not estimable) in the IC2/3 group, 8·8 months (95% CI 7·1 to 10·6) in the IC1/2/3, and 7·9 months (95% CI 6·6 to 9·3) in all patients. Grade 3–4 related treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16% and grade 3–4 immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 5% of treated patients. Exploratory analyses showed TCGA subtypes and mutation load to be independently predictive for response to atezolizumab. Interpretation Atezolizumab demonstrated durable activity and good tolerability in this population. PD-L1 expression on immune cells was associated with response. This is the first report to show the association of TCGA subtypes with response to immune checkpoint inhibition and demonstrate the importance of mutation load as a biomarker of response to this class of agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Funding F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

BACKGROUND Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer is associated with activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) intracellular signaling pathway. In early studies, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus added to endocrine therapy showed antitumor activity. METHODS In this phase 3, randomized trial, we compared everolimus and exemestane versus exemestane and placebo (randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio) in 724 patients with hormone-receptor–positive advanced breast cancer who had recurrence or progression while receiving previous therapy with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant setting or to treat advanced disease (or both). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included survival, response rate, and safety. A preplanned interim analysis was performed by an independent data and safety monitoring committee after 359 progression-free survival events were observed. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two study groups. The median age was 62 years, 56% had visceral involvement, and 84% had hormone-sensitive disease. Previous therapy included letrozole or anastrozole (100%), tamoxifen (48%), fulvestrant (16%), and chemotherapy (68%). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were stomatitis (8% in the everolimus-plus-exemestane group vs. 1% in the placebo-plus-exemestane group), anemia (6% vs. <1%), dyspnea (4% vs. 1%), hyperglycemia (4% vs. <1%), fatigue (4% vs. 1%), and pneumonitis (3% vs. 0%). At the interim analysis, median progression-free survival was 6.9 months with everolimus plus exemestane and 2.8 months with placebo plus exemestane, according to assessments by local investigators (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.54; P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was 10.6 months and 4.1 months, respectively, according to central assessment (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.47; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Everolimus combined with an aromatase inhibitor improved progression-free survival in patients with hormone-receptor–positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. (Funded by Novartis; BOLERO-2 ClinicalTrials .gov number, NCT00863655.)

BACKGROUND Resistance to therapy with BRAF kinase inhibitors is associated with reactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. To address this problem, we conducted a phase 1 and 2 trial of combined treatment with dabrafenib, a selective BRAF inhibitor, and trametinib, a selective MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitor. METHODS In this open-label study involving 247 patients with metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600 mutations, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic activity and safety of oral dabrafenib (75 or 150 mg twice daily) and trametinib (1, 1.5, or 2 mg daily) in 85 patients and then randomly assigned 162 patients to receive combination therapy with dabrafenib (150 mg) plus trametinib (1 or 2 mg) or dabrafenib monotherapy. The primary end points were the incidence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, survival free of melanoma progression, and response. Secondary end points were overall survival and pharmacokinetic activity. RESULTS Dose-limiting toxic effects were infrequently observed in patients receiving combination therapy with 150 mg of dabrafenib and 2 mg of trametinib (combination 150/2). Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was seen in 7% of patients receiving combination 150/2 and in 19% receiving monotherapy (P = 0.09), whereas pyrexia was more common in the combination 150/2 group than in the monotherapy group (71% vs. 26%). Median progression-free survival in the combination 150/2 group was 9.4 months, as compared with 5.8 months in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.62; P<0.001). The rate of complete or partial response with combination 150/2 therapy was 76%, as compared with 54% with monotherapy (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Dabrafenib and trametinib were safely combined at full monotherapy doses. The rate of pyrexia was increased with combination therapy, whereas the rate of proliferative skin lesions was nonsignificantly reduced. Progression-free survival was significantly improved. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01072175.)