Background: The Head Impulse Paradigm (HIMP) and Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) are objective, quantitative methods that directly test the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and are increasingly becoming a standard in evaluating patients with vestibular disorders.Objective: The main objective was to assess the correlations between HIMP and SHIMP parameters in patients with superior vestibular neuritis (VN) and healthy participants. Additionally, the correlations between the parameters of each method were analyzed.Methods: A retrospective cohort, non-randomized study was designed. HIMP and SHIMP were performed on 40 patients with VN and 20 healthy participants (40 ears). HIMP and SHIMP parameters were measured and calculated. Pearson's or Spearson's correlations were used to establish the associations among them.Results: A strong positive correlation was found between HIMP and SHIMP gain (Pearson's r = 0.957, p = 0.000), while strong negative correlations were detected between HIMP and SHIMP saccade amplitudes (r = −0.637, p = 0.000) and percentages of overt saccades (r = −0.631, p = 0.000). In HIMP, strong and moderate positive correlations were identified between gain and saccade amplitude (R2 = 0.726, p = 0.000) and gain and saccade percentage (R2 = 0.558, p = 0.000), respectively. By contrast, an extremely weak positive correlation was observed between gain and latency (R2 = 0.053, p = 0.040). In SHIMP, strong and moderate positive correlations were found between gain and saccade percentage (R2 = 0.723, p = 0.000) and gain and saccade amplitude (R2 = 0.525, p = 0.000), respectively, but no correlation was detected between gain and latency (R2 = 0.006, p = 0.490).Conclusions: HIMP and SHIMP-related parameters were highly correlated (inter-method). Within each method (intra-method), moderate to strong correlations in VOR assessment were observed. These results further contribute to our understanding of the relationship between HIMP and SHIMP as well as to the diagnosis.

ObjectiveTo define the normal values and examine the influence of aging on B81 bone vibrator-induced cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (B81-cVEMPs) and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (B81-oVEMPs).MethodsSeventy healthy subjects, divided into seven groups according to their ages, were enrolled in this study. The 4–9-, 10–19-, 20–29-, 30–39-, 40–49-, 50–59-, and 60–70-year-old participants were divided into groups I–VII, respectively. B81-cVEMP and B81-oVEMP were recorded in each group.ResultsThe B81-cVEMP response rates for groups I–VII were 100, 100, 100, 100, 95, 95, and 75%, respectively, with significant differences only between groups I–VI and group VII (p = 0.047, p < 0.05). The B81-oVEMP response rates for groups I–VII were 100, 100, 100, 100, 70, 65, and 40%, respectively, with significant differences only between groups I–IV and groups V–VII (p = 0.020, p = 0.008, p = 0.000; p < 0.05). The threshold, P13, and N23 latencies of B81-cVEMP positively correlated with age (r = 0.756, p = 0.000; r = 0.357, p = 0.003; r = 0.316, p = 0.009; p < 0.05). The raw amplitudes and corrected amplitudes negatively correlated with age (r = −0.641, p = 0.000; r = −0.609, p = 0.000, p < 0.05). For B81-oVEMP, the corrected amplitudes negatively correlated with age (r = −0.638, p = 0.000, p<0.05), but the threshold and N10 latency positively correlated with age (r = 0.768, p = 0.000; r = 0.334, p = 0.009, p < 0.05). Moreover, the interaural asymmetry ratio did not significantly correlate with age for B81-cVEMP and B81-oVEMP.ConclusionAs age increased, the B81-cVEMP response rate decreased, the thresholds increased, P13 and N23 latencies were prolonged, and the raw amplitude and corrected amplitude decreased. The B81-oVEMP response rate and corrected amplitude decreased, the thresholds increased, and N10 latency was prolonged with age. These changes are probably due to the occurrence of morphological and functional changes in the vestibular system with aging. Therefore, we suggest establishing different reference values according to different age groups when evaluating the VEMP results in patients with vestibular diseases.