C hronic stalling of DNA replication forks by DNA damage such as UV irradiation, ionizing irradiation, chemicals, and reactive cellular metabolites impedes the progression of the cell cycle and eventually causes cell death. To circumvent such situations, cells have evolved the postreplication repair (PRR) pathway that bypasses DNA lesions to resolve stalled forks without removing the actual damage (1). In budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PRR is carried out by 2 distinct pathways: translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switching (TS) (Fig. 1A). TLS uses multiple low-fidelity TLS polymerases to incorporate nucleotides across DNA lesions (2, 3). Switching from replicative polymerases ␦ or to TLS polymerases is promoted through the interaction between monoubiquitinated PCNA at lysine 164 (K164) and a ubiquitin-binding motif in TLS polymerases-a mechanism conserved from the budding yeast to human. The monoubiquitination of PCNA at K164 requires the RING-type ubiquitin ligase Rad18 (E3) and the ubiquitinconjugating enzyme Rad6 (E2).The TS pathway bypasses DNA damage by switching a stalled replicating end to the nascent daughter strand of the sister chromatid (1, 4). This pathway involves a lysine 63 (K63)-linked polyubiquitin chain that is further added onto the monoubiquitinated PCNA by Rad5 (E3) along with the Ubc13-Mms2 (E2 and E2 variant, respectively) heterodimer complex (Fig. 1 A). Distinct from the K48-linked polyubiquitination leading to protein degradation, the K63-linked polyubiquitination of PCNA is thought to promote TS in a proteasome-independent manner (5).The importance of the TLS pathway in the suppression of mammalian tumorigenesis emerged with the identification of a mutation in TLS polymerase in patients with the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum and from studies with mouse models (6, 7). Despite the presence of UBC13 and MMS2 homologues in humans, the importance of the TS pathway is less clear in mammals because K63-linked polyubiquitination of PCNA, a hallmark event for the TS pathway, had not been observed until recently (8-10). We recently identified human SHPRH, which possesses SWI2/SNF2 and RING domains with similar architecture to the yeast Rad5 as a functional homologue of yeast Rad5 (9). Specifically, we demonstrated the in vivo activity of SHPRH in promoting a K63-linked polyubiquitination of PCNA as well as physical interactions of SHPRH with PCNA, RAD18, and UBC13. Depletion of SHPRH increases genomic instability after genotoxic stress. Consistent with our work, another study also demonstrated that SHPRH could polyubiquitinate PCNA in vitro (11).In the present study, we demonstrated that ectopic expression of HLTF/SMARCA3/RUSH/HIP116/Zbu1 (hereafter, HLTF) enhanced PCNA polyubiquitination in vivo. Depletion of SHPRH or HLTF significantly reduced polyubiquitination of chromatin-bound PCNA upon treatment of cells with DNA-damaging agents that cause stalled DNA replication forks. Furthermore, Hltf-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) showed elevated chromosome breaks an...

SummaryBrain structure and size requires precise division of neural stem cells (NSCs), which self-renew and generate intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) and neurons. The factors that regulate NSCs remain poorly understood, as do mechanistic explanations of how aberrant NSC division causes reduced brain size as seen in microcephaly. Here we demonstrate that Magoh, a component of the exon junction complex (EJC) that binds RNA, controls mouse cerebral cortical size by regulating NSC division. Magoh haploinsufficiency causes microcephaly due to INP depletion and neuronal apoptosis. Defective mitosis underlies these phenotypes as depletion of EJC components disrupts mitotic spindle orientation and integrity, chromosome number, and genomic stability. In utero rescue experiments revealed that a key function of Magoh is to control levels of the microcephaly-associated protein, LIS1, during neurogenesis. This study uncovers new requirements for the EJC in brain development, NSC maintenance, and mitosis, thus implicating this complex in the pathogenesis of microcephaly.

Hyperphosphorylation of RPA2 at serine 4 and serine 8 (S4, S8) has been used as a marker for activation of the DNA damage response. What types of DNA lesions cause RPA2 hyperphosphorylation, which kinase(s) are responsible for them, and what is the biological outcome of these phosphorylations, however, have not been fully investigated. In this study we demonstrate that RPA2 hyperphosphorylation occurs primarily in response to genotoxic stresses that cause high levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and that the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex (DNA-PK) is responsible for the modifications in vivo. Alteration of S4, S8 of RPA2 to alanines, which prevent phosphorylations at these sites, caused increased mitotic entry with concomitant increases in RAD51 foci and homologous recombination. Taken together, our results demonstrate that RPA2 hyperphosphorylation by DNA-PK in response to DSBs blocks unscheduled homologous recombination and delays mitotic entry. This pathway thus permits cells to repair DNA damage properly and increase cell viability.